Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 11



File:Buffalo mem aud.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Could find no mention of a free license at ; also, authorship is uncertain, based on the notes at the bottom. No-license tag has been repeatedly removed, without any license being added. dave pape (talk) 01:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ChiEmeraldsPortal.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Deleted. Saying PD does not necessarily make it so. Stifle (talk) 09:49, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Unsourced combination of images, unlikely to be a PD license.  MBisanz  talk 03:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Is too a PD license! I made it myself! Period. Good Day, Sir. PieMan.EXE MyPage | Exchange Words With Me 19:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Question Which images have been combined here? – The Parting Glass 20:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Well there are the 2 counters at the bottom, the diamond with the logo overlaid on it, and the wheel on top. If PieMan says it is his own, I can't prove it is non-free, it just looke unlikely to be free.  MBisanz  talk 04:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Logo?! That is a 2-d Metal Ball! Inside (not overlaid) a 2-d diamond shape! And the 2 counters are ones I built myself! And the "Wheel" is a mixture of gradients, circles, and round shapes combined to look like a portal! If you have Photoshop Elements, then you could duplicate this picture without copying it! And, besides, I am only, I repeat, I am ONLY using it for my PERSONAL user page, not an article! Now please get off my back! Thank you. PieMan.EXE MyPage | Exchange Words With Me 22:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Delete If there is reasonable uncertainty regarding the provenance of an image which is used primarily for decoration, then NOT applies. – The Parting Glass 22:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Strong Keep See: Ignore all rules You are wasting my time. I am trying to improve Wikipedia. Please quit harrasing me. Good Day, Sirs. PieMan.EXE MyPage | Exchange Words With Me 22:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That is not a logical line of argument. How does adding a weird image to your userpage improve Wikipedia. I looked at your contributions, and it appears you have yet to make a single edit not related in some way to your user page. Wikipedia is not MySpace, user pages are a convenient way to "get to know" other editors, not just places to display images you create. And dismissing everyone with "Good Day Sirs" is not going to make us all go away either. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Have you checked Mega Man Battle Network (series) lately? PieMan.EXE MyPage | Exchange Words With Me 23:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Uh, nice try there. Mosmof (talk) 01:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yea, that wasn't very honest. . Beeblebrox (talk) 21:24, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Foxgirl.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Invalid claims of license (zh redirects here for its claim the image is GFDL). Please provide a non wiki link proving the image is released under the GFDL. -- lucasbfr  talk 11:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Se7en-artist.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Local image deleted. A previous version of the image was transwikied to Commons and is now showing through, until I get that deleted too. Stifle (talk) 09:45, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Sourced from hello7.com but claimed as PD - I can't see anything that indicates a free release of this image Peripitus (Talk) 11:10, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Parasphendale-affinis-nympths.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The image is marked CC-BY-NC (Noncommercial) on Flickr If the image was free it should have been uploaded to Commons were the image would have been marked. Bidgee (talk) 12:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't know Wikipedia was considered commercial use or/and didn't discern this from other CC licenses. --Boston (talk) 13:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Reply: I'm not saying you meant it. :) The flickr upload page on Commons has a list on what you can upload and can't upload. CC-BY-NC is classed as "restrictive". I hope that page may help. :) Bidgee (talk) 13:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Boston: unfortunately our content can be used for commercial purposes. CC-BY-NC is therefore not free "enough" for us. -- lucasbfr  talk 13:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Sounds like it needs to be deleted then. Sorry for taking up your time, but thanks for calling my attention to the issue and for edifying me about it.  I'll proceed appropriately in the future. --Boston (talk) 13:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Shiller4.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No OTRS confirmation of GFDL license; claims permission for Wikipedia only. dave pape (talk) 15:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I do not know how to approve it. I got the email from Schiller personally and he permitted me to use it on Wikipedia. Do I have to upload the email here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigerfool (talk • contribs)
 * See WP:CONSENT (and WP:COPYREQ) for details on confirming permission for the image. --dave pape (talk) 02:14, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Patch -Town Village.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

I am having a hard time believing that the uploader created, and owns the copyright to a village seal. Mosmof (talk) 22:56, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.