Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 12



File:Dallas Cowboys helmet.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Although I do not doubt that the image itself is completely the work of the uploader, an NFL helmet design would have to be considered the an intellectual property of the team. Mosmof (talk) 00:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I am withdrawing the nomination, as I have decided to be bold and replace the free license with a non-free license. The image could stand to be shrunk to a lower resolution, and removed from user boxes, though. --Mosmof (talk) 16:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rapid steaua crow.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

A duplicate of this image was uploaded at File:Oaia bucuresti.jpg (since deleted) under a spurious PD-old tag. This, combined with the fact that the image is low-res, makes me suspicious that it's just been lifted from a site and tagged PD invalidly. Stifle (talk) 11:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:To the end of hell.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

It is unlikely that this book cover is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License, and submitter has offered no proof or link to a source to verify this fact. Steamroller Assault (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lauren.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image copyright belongs to the artist, not the photographer. Mosmof (talk) 16:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Stat Quo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

While the photograph is freely licensed, the portion that is used is a copyrighted image belonging to the good people at Rap Snacks. Mosmof (talk) 22:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Odious Mortem.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:53, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

This image appears to be a copyright violation... It is a copy/paste of an image found on http://www.odiousmortem.com/index2.php?mortem=biography ... Adolphus (talk) 23:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.