Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 14



File:Chloe_Moretz.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of cc license on source site. Garion96 (talk) 02:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rimmer1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Used under fair use to illustrate subject in Red Dwarf but the subjects appearance in red dwarf isn't discussed in the article. Does not therefore meet NFCC Spartaz Humbug! 12:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Wrong forum, this is for discussing images that are possibly non-free, not for non-free compliance disputes. ViperSnake151 20:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Deleted as invalid fair use. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  11:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RAZOR TRN.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

As far as I am aware, Razor's programs are not GPL. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  14:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Razor is a piracy group. As in they are in the business of copyright violation. They purposely and freely distribute their software. Therefore this image is in the public domain. They have no legal means to claim copyright. Otherwise it's still fair use of a screen shot even if that wasn't the case. 68.25.20.16 (talk) 09:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MidUlsterEnglish.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:41, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

This image is from the copyrighted Concise Ulster Dictionary. The user has falsified details. Theosony (talk) 15:38, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The image is being discussed on Talk:Mid Ulster English. ~Asarlaí 15:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

The image has been discussed. It can be replaced by an official (governmental, public domain) source from Belfast City Library or PRONI, although this image is inaccurate and infringes copyright and should therefore be removed.--Theosony (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jonathan Earle.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Photo was not taken by an NSF employee - says "Credit: Rodney Choice and Choice Photography". Choice Photography is a private business. dave pape (talk) 16:18, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It does not matter, it was on a Federal Website, and is fairuse.
 * PD-USGov only applies to work of regular Federal employees, not the work of contractors. "the fact that the work has been printed by the U.S. Government does not determine its copyright status" (Copyright Office Practices, 206.02). --dave pape (talk) 04:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mark_fish.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Image appears on other websites, image appears to have been cropped Quentin X (talk) 20:24, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Timsamuels4.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

States "tim samuels photo © Wolf Kettler (www.wolfkettler.co.uk)", no evidence on site of PD release. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  22:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.