Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 17



File:Zoram.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

orphaned map, design and (c) in image do not match user name Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:57, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

username is self-identified on talk page as a reference to a family name notable in the region of origin/interest to the author, it's not their personal name, not clear if it's a part of their real name at all. the copyright logo does bother me tho. somebody (with more time than i have right now) should try backtracing the source. the image is simply a few extra names & a coloured-in area on a standard outline map of india, bangladesh, myanmar, thailand, western china, & vicinity. it seems to represent some group's claim of a national homeland. i'm not sure if there's anything that could be claimed as a copyright here? (the group probably wants their claims to be publicized in any case) can anybody identify the origin of the underlying map (which was modified to make this image)? if that's cc'd (especially if we have it on wikimedia someplace), then there isn't an issue here. Lx 121 (talk) 19:37, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:IgorPanarin.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Image is from the wall street journal - no indication there of a free licence Peripitus (Talk) 09:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Original image is not from WSJ. -  down  load  |  sign!  00:26, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Then where is it from that has a free licence ? - Peripitus (Talk) 00:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I cannot find the original website that I took it from. However, I would recommend it not be deleted because it is important for the Igor Panarin article, if that is possible.  -  down  load  |  sign!  02:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * This is a living person; fair use does not apply to this drawing. It is under copyright, though uncredited and with poor provinance. It must be deleted. Jonathunder (talk) 23:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Original is stated to be from The New Zonka Blog. It is entirely possible that that site stole it from the WSJ. Delete. - Fayenatic (talk) 17:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:IgorPanarinMap.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted. If a user wishes to claim fair use for this image, please contact me with details of the fair use rationale that you would like to use. Stifle (talk) 11:34, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Image is from the wall street journal - no indication there of a free licence Peripitus (Talk) 09:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Original image is not from WSJ. -  down  load  |  sign!  00:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Then where is it from that has a free licence ? - Peripitus (Talk) 00:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I cannot find the original website that I took it from. However, I would recommend it not be deleted because it is important for the Igor Panarin article, if that is possible.  -  down  load  |  sign!  02:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)


 * What if we remove the GNU as a possible and honest mistake and replace it with Fair Use w/ a rationale. We would not need to know the original author and the WSJ link would be valid as a source. Could that not be an option? Na uf ana  :  talk  23:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll do it. Thanks for the suggestion.   Wait... what template should I use?   -  down  load  |  sign!  04:12, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Fair use is going to fail if you don't have a source. This appears to be a press created image reflecting his views. Also, based on the professors work an editor could create a free version. Peripitus (Talk) 05:58, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.