Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 23



File:A Very Specil Love.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Screenshot - not free Peripitus (Talk) 04:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mars-1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

It is described as PD-NASA, but according to the source page, "The image at the top of the page shows a model of Mars 1 at the Moscow Aviation Institute. Courtesy of Alexander Chernov and the Virtual Space Museum", i.e. it's not a NASA image. The page history shows that originally it was uploaded with Template:PD-Soviet, but later changed it to Template:PD-USGov-NASA. Daggerstab (talk) 16:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Not free, but I think this would definitely be fair use. Good luck taking another picture of the thing as it zooms about the Solar System. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Joanna Van Gyseghem.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:58, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Does not appear to be free, no source given. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  20:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * This image is definitely a copyvio. The photo belongs to Clive Limpkin/Express/Getty Images and even has a watermark on it. Kaldari (talk) 19:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Fruitpackers event flyer.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was keep. Nom withdrawn, uploader provided information, good faith has (not) been assumed.-Andrew c [talk] 01:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Judging from appearance of the flyer, slightly wrinkled with surrounding whitespace, this is clearly a scan of a found flyer. This would heavily imply that the uploader is not the creator of this work (and the lack of source would support that), so therefor the free tag is invalid. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  21:23, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a flyer for a dance party, not a piece of modern art. - &#10032; ALLST☆R &#10032; echo 21:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete It doesn't have to be art to be copyrighted. If the uploader didn't make it, they don't have the right to upload it here under a free license. (ESkog)(Talk) 01:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Highly unlikely that the uploader owns the copyright, whether it is 'art' is irrelevant. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  05:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hold on (insert trout slap here) and KEEP. It is not a "found" flyer as the nom accuses - seemingly in bad faith. I hope this can be added to their learning that indeed many people do go through the rather byzantine process of uploading and sussing out licensing and should be given good faith they are doing so. It's much easier to delete than upload. I did indeed create this flyer but it only shows a portion of it. It was for a benefit project in part for a larger ongoing project at Burning Man and a charity. This was one event of many that I believe are still occurring. Hope this information will help put this issue to rest. -- Banj e  b oi   03:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No offense or bad-faith intended. You'd be surprised at the number of people that think that scanning an image means "self-made" (which is usually the case with flyer images), and the summary didn't mention the source. This quacked like a duck, but if everyone is okay with it, I'll withdraw the nomination. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  08:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Appreciated, thank you! -- Banj e  b oi   03:29, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:FloodParis.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Still under copyright (creator died in 1940s), no ticket. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  22:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

The painting and all rights to the painting belong to me, personally, and were acquired by contract from the creator's family. See www.dewis.com, my website, which has that image and other images from the 400+ paintings of the creator that I own.Ruedetocqueville (talk) 16:26, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

In that case, please see Requesting_copyright_permission to obtain an OTRS ticket, which will prevent any future problems. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  18:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. I will.Ruedetocqueville (talk) 22:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Geniftikhar.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Two images. No evidence that uploader is the creator or the copyright holder. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  22:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

The Image has been scanned/photographed by the owner from his personal photo and painting collection and he has all the rights to freely distribute it. What kind of evidence is required?


 * Owning the photo does not mean you own the copyright to the paining itself. What is the copyright status of the painting? Who is the artist? ~  JohnnyMrNinja  09:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

An anonymous local artist was commissioned to paint this from a photograph(shot by my grandfather who happened to be brother of the subject) and a few others some 60 years ago. Since then we have allowed anybody interested to copy it including many magazines and newspapers. Since the subject and his immediate family died in Air crash in 1949 I guess his closest living relatives do have rights to distribute his photos, especially the ones shot by family photographers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Real rajput (talk • contribs) 16:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not an expert on this sort of thing, but it would seem then that this tag is valid. Anyone else have an opinion? ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  21:18, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:JMJudd.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Claimed to be uploader's own work, but appears to be a professional photo. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:13, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

This was an on-set photo I asked the photographer to take on my camera, during the shoot. We were listening to the AD's instructions as we broke before we shot the scene. There is no reason to delete the image... 71.33.66.107 (talk) 20:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Please remove the tag... 71.33.69.111 (talk) 20:11, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment It appears to be the same resolution as images found on jeanmariesimpson.com, although this image itself doesn't appear to be there. The easiest way to verify that this is a genuine free image is to A)upload a higher resolution version (which would be nice anyways), or B)list permission on jeanmariesimpson.com, if, as I understand it, this picture was uploaded by one of the subjects. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  18:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

I uploaded the original that is in front of the greenscreen, prior to being photoshopped. It isn't working, though. Not sure what the problem is...Jeanmariesimpson (talk) 02:42, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure what the problem was either, but I moved both versions to Commons. It is another version of the same image, and I can't find it in the internet anywhere, so it would seem clear that the uploader owns the image. The second version is a little pixelated, but oh well... File:Jeanmarie Simpson and Judd Nelson.jpg and File:Jeanmarie Simpson and Judd Nelson (modified).jpg. So the local version will be deleted anyways, but only because it is now on Commons. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  06:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ff noise comparison.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Unused, no source listed. Also, it is not immediately clear what this is meant to be an image of (although I'm sure that can be found out). ~  JohnnyMrNinja  23:46, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Although probably not a copyvio, as the uploader is an admin on Commons, I don't see any reason why we need this image. Kaldari (talk) 19:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ff highlight detail.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Unused, no source listed. Also, it is not immediately clear what this is meant to be an image of (although I'm sure that can be found out). ~  JohnnyMrNinja  23:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Although probably not a copyvio, as the uploader is an admin on Commons, I don't see any reason why we need this image. Kaldari (talk) 19:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.