Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 24



File:Tulsa Depot.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Does not appear to be self-made, no evidence it was self-made, no source given. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  00:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * What makes you think this was not self-made as claimed? Looks like the sort of picture anyone with a halfway decent camera could take. Crypticfirefly (talk) 07:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no claim that it was self-made, no source given at all. It just looks sort-of web-resolution, that's why I said that. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  09:16, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Chap831.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

No evidence to support the GFDL tag. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  00:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete uploader first uploaded image with attribution to web site but no copyright status; it was deleted. This reupload is according to uploader "Fair Use: Permission granted". Uploader was asked for clarification more than a year ago without response. -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Imanol ordorika 4.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Unused image, no source listed. Who the picture is of is not clear either. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  00:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It is obviously a picture of Imanol Ordorika Sacristán, as suggested by the file name. Here's another picture of the guy so you can confirm that.   As for being unused, it was in the article about him at one time but it was removed by an anonymous editor on March 27, 2007. Not that any of this is relevant as to the lack of source information, but I wanted to make it clear that this isn't quite as pointless an image as it may have seemed at first. Crypticfirefly (talk) 07:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I added the article link to the image. I didn't really investigate beyond the sourcing. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  09:21, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Citrate Synthase Active Site.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

No source listed. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  01:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Triad symbol.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

No source listed. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  02:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like it was crudely cropped from another picture. That and the small image size makes me think it is probably a copyvio. Kaldari (talk) 20:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CreatingNewPrivateKey.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

No source listed. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  05:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:2step pattern2.ogg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Probably self-made, but with no source info, and the uploader not active, there is no way to tell. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  05:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cyan1.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Probably self-made, but no source given. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  05:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tvc 64plus.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

No source given. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  05:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tulsa Arena.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

No source given. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  05:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Travis (chimpanzee).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Given the animal's popularity and frequent public appearances (while alive), there are likely free images to be found and freely used, rather than making a fair-use claim on a photo taken from a newspaper website. I've attempted to tag as disputed fair use, but uploader removes, but his logic is faulty (IMO). I'll let a broader discussion ensue here Zim Zala Bim  talk  06:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Constant use of non-free images when they aren't needed is why photos are rarely released for free use. What are we learning by using this replaceable non-free picture? That he looked like a chimp? Do you think that readers will say, "Oh wait, I think I know that chimp!" It's a bit silly. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  07:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - It is a picture of the subjuct of the article. It is for an encyclopedia article and not for Wikimedia Commons. It is a free image, since it is under fair use and freedom of the press, etc. Also, "fair use" helps keep it from being vandalized.--Chuck (talk) 21:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * With all due respect, you are not at all understanding our image use policy and the concept of fair use, especially as applied here at Wikipedia. -- Zim Zala</b> Bim <sup style="color:black;">talk  21:34, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Absolutely per nomination - then await uploading of a picture of this chimp taken by a member of wikipedia - indeed ask for it and the picture is likely to come.-- VS talk 21:58, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obvious copyright violation. Jokestress (talk) 22:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * comment This seems to meet most of the fair use criteria. The subject is dead so there's likely no free equivalent (certainly no new pictures will be being made). 2,3,4,5,6,7,9 seem ok. The real issue seems to be 8. So persuade us that WP:FAIR's criterion 8 holds. JoshuaZ (talk) 14:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Emblem-pass.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

No source for photo given. Also I'm not sure about copyright status of passport images from India. Anyone know about that? ~  JohnnyMrNinja  06:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Marion 1017.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

No source given. Also, I'm pretty sure that this would count as derivative. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  06:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * As this is a plaque from the South Carolina state house, I would imagine that the plaque itself is probably out of copyright. I can't find anything that conclusively states when it was created, though. The sourcing issue is still a problem. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Image size and meta-data indicate that the photo itself is likely just that. Dating the plaque and finding who made it (And under what conditions) might help, tho. Protonk (talk) 02:23, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * And just to be overly-specific, the main issue is that it is a picture of a 3D work with no listed source. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  00:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Magenta1.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

No source given. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  07:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No source and a poor quality image anyway. Kaldari (talk) 22:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Psychophysical.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

No source listed. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  07:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Scenter7.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

No source given. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  07:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No source given but the meta-data attached to the picture and the comment that this was made during the Sprint center open house. I would say that this indicates that this is the users own work and that the user just forgot to indicate this in the source.~  Hngrange  07:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It is very likely that this was "self-made", however that has not been explicitly stated by the uploader, so we can't keep it. If the creator comments before it is deleted, great. If not, they are more than welcome to upload the image again with complete information. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  07:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SCenter1.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

No source given. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  07:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Seniorlib.gif
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

No source given. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  07:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Doctor Who - classic series DVDs.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Seems to be a derivative work; photo of several spines of Doctor Who DVD releases. Not sure the uploader can claim to hold the rights to this image. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Should probably be Non-free video cover at a lower resolution. -- WOSlinker (talk) 15:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * This is a photograph of a creative arrangement of commercial products. Without giving you a course on copyright law, the person who took this photograph can claim to hold the rights in the entire image. Just because there is something (or even several somethings) in a picture that may be subject to copyright does not necessarily make the picture a "derivative" of those items. The image appears to be correctly tagged. Crypticfirefly (talk) 07:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * One DVD cover would require a notice that the copyright belonged to the designer of that cover. So surely x DVD covers (where x is however many DVD's are in that picture) requires the same thing. 129.215.149.98 (talk) 13:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Crypticfirefly is correct. Copyright law doesn't stack in the way you describe, otherwise we'd have no photographs on biography pages unless we got the permission of every copyright holder whose clothing the subject was wearing.  If the photographer gives us permission to use this image, we can use it.  --Zoe.R (talk) 10:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC) (law student)

This picture is not in breach of copyright at all. Malcolm XIV (talk) 20:38, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Is there some reason you believe this to be the case? (ESkog)(Talk) 23:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The same reason Crypticfirefly and Zoe.R give immediately above. Do you know anything about copyright law? Malcolm XIV (talk) 00:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Not a violation any more than, say, File:Chambery interieur mediatheque 600px.jpg. – Quadell (talk) 01:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Iwuchamps.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

This user has uploaded a dozen copyrighted images which were improperly claimed PD-self. This image is web resolution, strikingly similar to and has a different timestamp then the non-webresolution images this user has uploaded. Andrew c [talk] 19:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Looks like I uploaded this one wrong - my bad. Manutdglory (talk) 21:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Biolaquad.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

User has uploaded a dozen copyrighted image improperly claimed as PD-self. This is a really low resolution, web image. Andrew c [talk] 19:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Looks like I uploaded this one wrong - my bad. Manutdglory (talk) 21:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Iwustudentcenterpiazza.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

User has uploaded dozens of copyrighted images and claimed PD-self. This is a web resolution image of a busy student union building that happens to be empty with the chairs perfectly aligned. How likely a situation is that? Andrew c [talk] 19:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * This one's mine - I worked for IWU. The photo was taken over break, which is why no one is there. Manutdglory (talk) 21:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * File:Studentcenterpiazza.jpg is an image that is the same size/resolution, same camera, and same timestamp as the rest of your IWU photos. The one I posted here doesn't match the profile for your IWU series (but it's resolution and quality seems to match another profile...) Please forgive me for still being a little suspicious.-Andrew c [talk] 00:34, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that's the one I was referring to - hmmm, that's weird. I must have written in the wrong name, since they're so similar. I'll change them. Manutdglory (talk) 00:50, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Are you sure the image is not from here? Kevin (talk) 00:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm sure enough. I speedied the image.  If the Flikr account is infringing upon Manutdglory, s/he may deal with that in due time.  but the resolution is identical to the image on flikr--it's the same file--and the flikr account it is posted under claims all rights. Protonk (talk) 01:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Marinerschurchstudentcenter.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Same as above, untrustworthy user uploaded webresolution image. Andrew c [talk] 19:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks like I uploaded this one wrong - my bad. Manutdglory (talk) 21:56, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Stanley-Ann.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Posed, clearly an old image. I suspect this image was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 19:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Diosgyor007.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Seems to have been taken from elsewhere. Watermark, low res, no information on how it was created. J Milburn (talk) 20:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Blatent. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  10:07, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Shaun-Donovan.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Posed (official?) photo. I suspect this was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 20:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:La-Jornada-collage.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Collage of a newspaper - derivative work and not free Peripitus (Talk) 20:56, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment-- collages are not by definition "derivative works." Or at least they are not if you are using "derivative work" as a term of art in US copyright law. God knows what it means in the context of Wikipedia. Crypticfirefly (talk) 07:49, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I think in this context, with the paper title and headlines being the focus, it would infringe on copyright. I think. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  09:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No argument there. Just observing that a collage is not, by definition, problematic. Crypticfirefly (talk) 06:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * :) OK. Delete ~  JohnnyMrNinja  11:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Shakira Photos.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

I strongly doubt the uploaders assertion of self-creation Kevin (talk) 22:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.