Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 25



File:Shaundonovan.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:30, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Clear AP stamp on the photo. Uploader claims PD as the image was found on america.gov. This apparently is not the work of the federal government, but rather, work found on, and used by the federal government, so the PD tag should not apply. Mosmof (talk) 00:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I wasn't sure which tag to use. It's used by the federal governmnent on america.gov, not made by the federal government. Spinach Monster (talk) 00:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SOLIS BOXER.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:30, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

PD-US Gov is claimed, but the image is found here, at an archive of Reuters news photos: http://www.nancarrow-webdesk.com/warehouse/storage2/2009-w01/img.457116_t.jpg Mosmof (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MARTINEZ CRAP.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:30, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

A cropped version of the same image is credited to "Susan Walsh/AP": http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/12/mel_martinez_to_retire.html Mosmof (talk) 00:36, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sibel Grammy.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Highly unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder —Krm500 (Communicate!) 01:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:All-Sports-Rugby-1924.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:41, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Copyright holder listed appears to be the owner of a copy of the magazine rather than the copyright holder. In any case, there is no evidence of permission. I've asked for evidence at, but in the meantime I thought it best to list this here as probably unfree. Chick Bowen 05:56, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Paul Howe.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:09, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Linked to commercial website - noted as self made but with a note "Licensed to Wikipedia. All rights reserved." - As far as can tell this is not a freely licenced image Peripitus (Talk) 06:48, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm guessing the uploader is the photographer, judging by the name. Obviously, "All rights reserved" doesn't work for Wikipedia. But an OTRS ticket might work? --Mosmof (talk) 17:48, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm the photographer and person who submitted the image. My first upload so I obviously messed it up.  The rights I was looking for was "Creative Commons Attribution No Commercial No Derivative".  Does that work for Wikipedia?  If not, what's the closest rights I should be using? -- Dbphotos 12:31, 25 February 2009 (CST)
 * For use on Wikipedia, you have to allow commercial and derivative use. Your best bets are Cc-by-sa or Cc-by. --Mosmof (talk) 22:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I updated the rights to a CC listed on Wikipedia, so it should be good. Let me know if you see any errors still.  Thanks! - Dbphotos 17:51, 2 February 2009 (CST)
 * Per 2009022510062901, this is only free for non-commercial use, and has been deleted as such. Stifle (talk) 14:58, 27 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Just to note that a permission was subsequently received and the image restored. Stifle (talk) 16:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

All pictures on The Membranes

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted- F ASTILY  (TALK) 01:43, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Membranes-band2.jpg, File:Pinstripehype1.jpg, File:Spikes.jpeg, File:Trad rock.jpg, File:Membraneslive....jpg, File:Giftoflifejpg.jpg, File:Membranes87.jpg, File:Membraneshmv.jpeg, File:Kissassgodhead.jpg. Obviously non free. The uploader User:PhilCurtis had many uploads deleted because of licensing issues (see his talk page. Some files had already been deleted, he only uploaded them again with another licence, but sure it's non free. Numbers 2, 3, 4, 6 are simply covers from records ; number 5 is scanned from somewhere, numbers 7, 8 and 9 are pictures  taken from the album Kiss Ass, Godhead. All that stuff should be removed. Inauthentique (talk) 17:43, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SJHS Name Banner.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

File talk page indicates this is a copyvio, appears to be likely copyvio.  MBisanz  talk 20:50, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Saad alharthi.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Watermark suggests this is not a free image. Mosmof (talk) 22:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:300px-NathEC.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I doubt this is own work multichill (talk) 23:15, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Adobe-fxb3-customized.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Appears to be a screenshot of copyrighted software. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:21, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Iglesia.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Source is cited as "A Lycos. com website" - uploader presumed it was free but that was long ago. Image is currently orphaned anyway, so probably no harm in deleting. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.