Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 26



File:BigRed.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Image does not exist. If the image name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:46, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Uploader used, but the image itself clearly says that it came from a university, as does the text of the article, and thus it may be subject to copyright. (It also might not be, depending upon the source of funding of the research; if it was federally funded, the US govt. copyright exemption might apply). Regardless, the license tag does not match the facts. Also, the uploader's talk page has nothing on it (besides the copyright stuff I just added) but gibberish, which is not a good sign, and neither is the lack of a user page proper. —  SMcCandlish  &#91;talk&#93; &#91;cont&#93; ‹(-¿-)› 19:07, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:BrentwoodCampus.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:56, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

appears to be google maps; no source provided Skier Dude  ( talk ) 05:18, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:BCFPD HQ.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Source listed as website, low-resolution, no indication this is actually free. Declined speedy. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  08:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Given the username and contribution history, I am inclined to assume good faith here--or at least wait while this can be sorted out via OTRS. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Even if a ticket was given, this image is so low-resolution as to be almost worthless. You can make out that there is a building, but that's about all. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  08:20, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just because someone has a username which may be associated with what they are uploading does not mean they are entitled to exemption from our copyvio standards. The website the image was pulled from clearly says "©2009 Boone County Fire Protection District". Unless we have evidence to the contrary, this should be treated as an apparent copyvio. The uploader has been notified (26 February). If they fail to respond within the next week or so, this image should be deleted. Kaldari (talk) 19:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Western Electric 1500.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:09, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

fair use image, now replaced by a public domain (or similar) image uploaded by user:mcheath. this image has already been removed from the article Western Electric model 1500 telephone Изогиз (talk) 09:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ancient-anga-banga-kalinga-magadha.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

This seems pretty clearly to be a derivative image of http://www.garoiashram.org/pageimages/ancient-anga-banga-kalinga-magadha.jpg Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That's no derivative, that's a direct copy! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.63.100.164 (talk) 19:11, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Andy12.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Licensed as 'all rights reserved' at Flickr. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  20:55, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Christine McVie.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Blatantly not a flickr original, looks like a promo pic. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  21:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Stifle (talk) 16:58, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

== Doctor Who - classic series DVDs.jpg ==
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Image_name.ext

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace " " with the actual name of the image. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after " ". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUI or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

reason Dominic Francis (talk) 21:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC) This is a photograph of the spines of the Doctor Who DVDs which I own. The photograph was taken by myself. I don't think it infringes any copyright.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.