Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 27



File:Baku Satellite.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

It's a bird, it's a plane, it's Baku87 taking satellite pictures. Baku87 uploads pictures to his website than gives permission to use it on wikipedia. That's clever. VartanM (talk) 01:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Empro1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Really not sure here. It's a picture of an ad/poster. What does that count as, if anything? ~  JohnnyMrNinja  08:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nobody's commented, the uploader is not active. It is a reproduction of a copyrighted 2D image, so I think that is just blatant copyvio. The uploader has released the image as GFDL, but it's still non-free, and unused. I think. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  00:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I took this picture myself, plus the ad/poster is quite old at this point (from year 2000?) and was related to the 'grand opening' of EMP, not an everyday image. Perhaps it's a violation, but it seems extremely unlikely here that anyone would object. If it's still against the rules, I don't mind it being removed. jkl_sem (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC).
 * Double delete. The uploader's license is a non-commercial license ("I request that you do not use this image for commercial purposes"), and the banner itself is copyrighted; it appears to be a US photograph, and freedom of panorama there is limited to buildings. Stifle (talk) 12:35, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * "The GFDL applies, but I request that you do not use this image for commercial purposes." I think he meant that it is GFDL so you can do whatever that allows, but it'd be nice if that wasn't for commercial purposes (although that might've been clearer). Many of his images had a similar disclaimer. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  12:44, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:S23rtdg3s.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Watermarked, unlikely uploader is the creator. MER-C 09:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Christinetaylor.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:32, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Looks like a copyrighted publicity photo. Uploader has several other copyright violations, but I'm listing here because I can't find a matching original source. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)


 * http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809266172/photo/premiere/970420791 PhilKnight (talk) 23:33, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Grapesnump.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Image is taken from artist's MySpace, nothing to indicate it is licensed as claimed (other URL shown on the image description page deadlinks) ChrisTheDude (talk) 22:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Digsby release 19635.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Contains various non-free logos. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  23:28, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Logos are de minimis. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm transferring to FFD as the image is not used. Stifle (talk) 16:58, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.