Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 28



File:BirminghamMeetinghouseBronzeMarker.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of this discussion was keep as the text of the marker is PD pre-1923.-Andrew c [talk] 19:24, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

A photo of text which has not be licensed CC-by, as such unfree. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  09:45, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Does it matter when the marker was erected? Because it was erected before 1923, so if the text were print it would be out of copyright.  Wouldn't it?  Or does that not hold true for text? --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 18:48, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, it does make a difference. By US law, this is now PD. — BQZip01 —  talk 06:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per above. I applaud the objector's attempt to help, but it is misguided in this instance. — BQZip01 —  talk 06:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Plaque text is now in the public domain. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Se7en-singer.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Looks promotional, no PD notice at source (as far as I can see). &mdash; neuro  (talk)  09:48, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Communicating with someone who claims to be the photographer in OTRS ticket 2009030210060383 (no confirmation yet).  howcheng  {chat} 21:13, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Abuna small.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

No evidence that this is a free image. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  11:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ajvdelft.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

No evidence this is a free image. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  11:34, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CinderellaCastleGolden.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

No evidence this is a free image. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  11:37, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Howie1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Seems to be a screen-cap, used ironically. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  11:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Koala.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

No evidence this image is free. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  11:42, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:AlymCadre1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

No evidence or claim this is free or self-made. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  11:48, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Amaranthus spinosus c.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

No evidence or claim this image is free or self-made. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  11:50, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Desert.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Does not appear to be free, no evidence it is free. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  11:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:100 0221.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

No evidence this image is free. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  12:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hismall.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

School logo: unlikely to be public domain created by uploader, as asserted. Jonathunder (talk) 14:04, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Akron.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, free image

Logo contains sufficient originality. ViperSnake151 14:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose If one looks at the article that guides these determinations, located at Threshold of originality, the example given, the Boeing logo, it is almost exactly the same: only text that is highly slanted. This logo only consists of text, and to quote Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits Inc., "Although a label's "graphical illustrations" are normally copyrightable, "textual matter" is not."  Although stylized to some degree, this label is only textual matter.-- 2008 Olym pian chit chat 00:44, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose This logo consists exclusively of text in a certain font and lacks the originality to be copyrighted per the above mentioned case and the rationale included in the tags on the image. — BQZip01 —  talk 01:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per PD-textlogo. Does not contain sufficient originality. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I think otherwise because
 * 1) It's on an angle.
 * 2) The Z is slightly stylized
 * 3) It is complex looking, the arrangement of the letters in relation to this would not be specifically reproducible as a typeface.
 * It's borderline. The Skyy bottle's logo is NOT complex in comparison to this. ViperSnake151 15:38, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * (1): The orientation is not really relevant. (2): Many typefaces contain uppercase letters with a greater degree of stylization (here in a small caps layout). (3): I disagree. I think it would be specifically reproducible as a typeface. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Unfree. PD-text does not apply here. This is a unique logotype, not a typeface. It is also probable that this was hand drawn before digital typography. Regardless, the letter spacing and the way the Z and S extend, and the raising of the i, in addition to the multiple outlining clearly suggest this is more than just at typeface. The way these letters have been drawn only makes sense in very limited contexts, and even with contemporary digital typography, there is not a typeface that could produce this logo by just typing (it may be plausible, but extremely unlikely to have an extended font set with swash and alternative characters that may be able to produce this configuration of letters, but not the outlining.) Comparing this to Boeing is nonsense, IMO. The Boeing logo is simply type that has not been manipulated in any sense. It is an oblique sans serif in all caps with a bit of letterspacing. No outlining, no manipulated characters. -Andrew c [talk] 19:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Are you saying that no other logos use a slant? That isn't unique. A little jig in the Z doesn't make it especially unique. I can easily create such a typeface for logos. Realize that, even if it was hand-drawn (and even making such an assertion is completely speculative on your part), that the typeface could still be recreated. Even ornate logos like Coca-cola's are PD-text. Outlining characters doesn't make them a unique work of art. — BQZip01 —  talk 21:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, the fact that it is PD doesn't mean it can't be trademarked, just that it cannot be copyrighted. — BQZip01 —  talk 21:16, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: I am reasonably certain that this logo is subject to trademark, but not copyright, protection. – Quadell (talk) 01:08, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * My point exactly. Thanks Quadell. — BQZip01 —  talk 05:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:KNM_Kvikk.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Images from Forsvarets Mediesenter is not public domin Rettetast (talk) 14:42, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Relaxnews.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

http://www.relaxnews.com/web/v50/fr/ multichill (talk) 15:45, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jaguares de Chiapas.PNG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Copyrighted logo, unlikely that uploader is copyright holder. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  18:04, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:JonMcLaughlin.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

No evidence this is a free image. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  18:28, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Carolinedavis 291006 003.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Shows visible video compression artefacts, blatantly unfree screenshot taken from video stream. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  22:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Looknorth lunch2008c-01.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Shows visible video artefacts, blatantly unfree screenshot. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  22:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.