Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 4



File:Shaw in It Happened Here.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

This image is captured from the trailer for the film It Happened Here; it is supposedly public domain under the claim that it was published in the United States between 1923 and 1977 without a copyright notice. This is not the case; the trailer is copyrighted in 1965 to Rath Films Limited as seen in the last 10 seconds of the trailer here. Jappalang (talk) 01:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom., trailer has a copyright notice. feydey (talk) 12:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree Delete per nom.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 12:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:P-Town Village.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

city logo, highly unlikely released CC-xxx license Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Patchogue Village.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

city logo - highly unlikely released under cc-xxx license Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ibogaine story.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

book cover, unlikely uploader is (c) holder (has history of incorrectly licensed file uploads) Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:73421 CAL B727-200.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, no source given, user has cropped other (c) images and claimed "self" - also no OTRS for claimed permission (see summary) Skier Dude  ( talk ) 08:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Change license to and add a rational--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 13:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:396 CAL.TAIL.LOGO.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, no source given, user has cropped other (c) images and claimed "self" - this appears to be the same Skier Dude  ( talk ) 08:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cassels.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:04, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Image is copyrighted for The National Hockey League Players' Association, and any reproduction or publication of any part of the content of the NHLPA Website, without the express written permission of the NHLPA is prohibited. Moreover, even if NHLPA would give permission for the use of its images on Wikipedia, those images would still not be free, and could only be used in accordance to Wikipedia's policy on usage of unfree material, that among other things, forbids the use of unfree images where a free alternative "could be created" (which is the case for living players). – Nurmsook!  talk...  18:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It's tagged as a non-free image, so the image's freeness isn't in question here, so this isn't the appropriate forum.. I've tagged it as a replaceable fair use image. --Mosmof (talk) 18:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.