Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 7



File:Meserle-shooting.jpg
Image is sourced to "Indywire.org", a URL that doesn't appear to exist. —  pd_THOR  undefined | 06:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Mehserle-mugshot.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 


 * Keep. It has been established this is a non-free image, so it has been retagged. Now all it needs is a fair use rationale (if that is not provided in 7 days, it will be deleted).-Andrew c [talk] 15:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

No evidence the Douglas County, Nevada Sheriff's office released this image into the public domain per sourcing. —  pd_THOR  undefined | 06:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I did tag the photo wrong, because I wasn't aware of Template:Non-free mugshot, and confused the status of US federal mugshots with US state mugshots. (Not my field of law.) I'll re-tag. THF (talk) 06:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Talk pagelogo1234.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Blatant copyright violation of four coprorate logos (Transport for London, Microsoft, Adobe and Wikipedia) with no possible fair-use justification – not uploaded maliciously but by a new user who I assume isn't aware of copyright law and Wikimedia issue policy. –  iride scent  20:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Glenn Robinson.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

This image seems to come from Bucks.com, though I can't track down the original. Zagalejo^^^ 22:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Steve Scheffler.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't believe for one moment that the uploader took this photo themselves. No metadata, a fairly obvious thumbnail, and uploaded by a user who's laundry list of copyvio-warnings precludes the usual assumption of good faith. –  iride scent  22:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Brian Cardinal.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:53, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't believe for one moment that the uploader took this photo themselves. No metadata, a fairly obvious professionally posed thumbnail, and uploaded by a user who's laundry list of copyvio-warnings precludes the usual assumption of good faith. –  iride scent  22:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * This one is definitely from NBA.com. I've tagged it for speedy deletion. Zagalejo^^^ 22:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Carl Landry.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't believe for one moment that the uploader took this photo themselves. No metadata, a fairly obvious thumbnail, and uploaded by a user who's laundry list of copyvio-warnings precludes the usual assumption of good faith. –  iride scent  22:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rick Mount.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

(Dear lord, how many of these did you do?) I don't believe for one moment that the uploader took this photo themselves. No metadata, a fairly obvious thumbnail, and uploaded by a user who's laundry list of copyvio-warnings precludes the usual assumption of good faith. –  iride scent  22:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Chris Kramer.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

(And again…) I don't believe for one moment that the uploader took this photo themselves. No metadata, a fairly obvious thumbnail, and uploaded by a user who's laundry list of copyvio-warnings precludes the usual assumption of good faith. –  iride scent  22:40, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Robbie Hummel.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't believe for one moment that the uploader took this photo themselves. No metadata, a fairly obvious thumbnail, and uploaded by a user who's laundry list of copyvio-warnings precludes the usual assumption of good faith. –  iride scent  22:40, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:E'Twaun Moore.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

(I think this is the last of them.) I don't believe for one moment that the uploader took this photo themselves. No metadata, a fairly obvious thumbnail, and uploaded by a user who's laundry list of copyvio-warnings precludes the usual assumption of good faith. –  iride scent  22:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.