Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 8



File:Complete_set_of_Worlds_of_Power_books.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Derivative work multichill (talk) 00:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep retagged as non-free and added fair use rationale.-Andrew c [talk] 16:06, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Shankar_ehsaan_loy.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

No evidence of PD on source site. Garion96 (talk) 11:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Elmbrookchurch.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Low file size, odd width/height. Likely that this is from a website and not pd-self. Protonk (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - surprised I missed that one. has history of claiming PD-Self for images taken off the web (see number of images removed from his upload log). Difficult to show history since he removes all warnings from talk page. -- Zim Zala Bim  talk  15:22, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:159Sqn.GIF

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, royal 159th squadron - unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 21:58, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:AIO shield.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

orphaned logo - highly unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 22:04, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Undertaker wrestling Edge - bad quality.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:48, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Most likely a picture of a wrestling match that was taken at home while watching TV.  Simon KSK  22:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm terribly sorry, I didn't know you couldn't do that. I got a camera for my birthday so I started to take pics of stuff. My dog...  Red Rooster  96   22:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I deleted this. I dont know how to close these discussions though.  Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 17:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.