Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 January 1



File:Boney Kapoor Sridevi.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

This picture has a logo at the bottom and does not appear to be a free image. I request the uploader to clarify. Ravichandar My coffee shop 01:00, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Nativity Icon.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, target article unclear, given summary, highly doubtful uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sri rani.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, no metadeta, appears to be screenshot, (c) not held by uploader Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:51, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pshs gray bkgrd.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, if summary is correct, uploader would not be (c) holder of school logo Skier Dude  ( talk ) 05:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Longbean.jpg
Low resolution, no meta-data, strangely pixellated. Possibly taken from elsewhere? J Milburn (talk) 15:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Uploader has supplied a larger version that corrects the pixellation, and is bigger than typical web resolution, so I'm inclined to assume good faith here. It is also possible that meta-data was lost in image manipulation. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:39, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree and i am removing the tag.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 19:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Ayyappan.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Another one listed by DumbBot at CP, here. It was uploaded with an incomplete FUR,, then claimed as creator self when Stlbot complained,. Not sure what to make of it all, but listing it here for investigation. Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * P.S. Having just done the puic tags, I have to note that if it is fair use, it's missing a whole lot of FUR. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:33, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Crowasu.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

This image is owned by The State Press (image: http://www.asuwebdevil.com/node/2626), the Arizona State University daily newspaper, and should not be marked as GFDL-self. McMillin24 contribstalk 17:38, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jeffrey_Epstein_mug_shot.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Not a work of the US federal government. Garion96 (talk) 17:43, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Most works of the Florida government, including local branches, are PD. For some reason Template:PD-FLGov has been effectively deleted (apparently due to misuse), but AFACT, this is free. -Seidenstud (talk) 21:59, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

-- Image is already moved to Commons, now with the correct license tag. Local image is therefore deleted. Garion96 (talk) 16:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Seidenstud, image is in the public domain per PD-FLGov. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Manchester-metrolink-logo.svg
(Ignoring that it is the the logo of GMPTE and not Manchester Metrolink as claimed, this is a corporate logo and so is dubiously a free image. Certainly, File:Gmpte-logo.png has fair use rational. Pit-yacker (talk) 17:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Gmpte-logo.png is from a "downloaded from a website" (copyright; non-free) File:Manchester-metrolink-logo.svg is a from-scratch SVG made in Inkscape (probably more likely restricted by trademark issues).  —Sladen (talk) 17:54, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I disagree with the idea that redrawing (copying or whatever) a logo is novel enough to make it not a derivative work that is bound by the same copyright as the original. That said, if we go to the other file File:ManMetro logo no text.PNG which this one is based, there is a claim that since the image is just simply geometry, then it does not qualify for copyright (but can be trademarked). If that template is appropriately valid at the commons, then I would suggest that the solution to this issue would be to use those templates here on this image (or move this image to the commons and use those templates, but I guess I am getting sidetracked). I agree that however Sladen cannot redraw someone else's logo and then release it under the GFDL. The GFDL tag is inappropriate. With different tags, the image should be fine.-Andrew c [talk] 18:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Both this image and File:Gmpte-logo.png should be retagged PD-ineligible and Trademark —teb728 t c 06:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree that this is PD-ineligible/PD-textlogo per above. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:25, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ —Sladen (talk) 02:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * You forgot to tag the image in question PD-ineligible and Trademark i did it for you.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 22:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Sedes_runway.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

No mention of CC license on source site. Garion96 (talk) 17:49, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Triodos.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

No mention of CC license on source site. Garion96 (talk) 17:51, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lgts.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

no evidence of cc/gfdl license on source site. Garion96 (talk) 17:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Milos_Airport.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

no metadata, suspicius. See also other listing of images of uploader on this page. Garion96 (talk) 17:53, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kalamata_airport.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

no metadata, suspicius. See also other listing of images of uploader on this page. Garion96 (talk) 17:53, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:KATBandPhoto.PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Uploader states that he scanned the image out of a magazine. Undead Warrior (talk) 21:33, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:KatMetalAndHell.PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Album cover stated to be created by the uploader. I am very skeptical of this. Undead Warrior (talk) 21:35, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note The original uploader has removed the deletion/unfree notice from the image. Undead Warrior (talk) 02:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cleopatra 1934 film screenshot1.jpg
This image is not a screenshot from the film. It is decisively marked on the image itself that it is a 1952 copyrighted publicity still owned by Paramount Pictures. Any rationale given for fair use as a "screenshot" is invalid. Because it may be part of someone's collection does not mean the copyright belongs to them. Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:53, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Be that as it may, this is the wrong forum for it. This image is not possibly unfree, it is unfree for sure. Garion96 (talk) 00:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't see anything wrong with the source, because it might have come from there. It still has a tag on it. The thing that bugs me is the "Yes" under the replaceable section. Undead Warrior (talk) 06:55, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

- Kept - Wrong forum. Garion96 (talk) 21:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)