Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 January 10



File:LeeJunKi Splendor.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Though the image appears correctly sourced, both sources given have content that is user created. The image is a crop of what this is a downsampling. from the look it is a professional, publicity photo - not free Peripitus (Talk) 10:17, 10 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cmulhs students1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure "from a Friendster user" is enough information to determine that the image is GFDL. Uploader seems to have a history of image issues. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:17, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cmulhs students3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure "Friendster" is enough information to determine that the image is GFDL. Uploader seems to have a history of image issues. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cmulhs alumni1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure "Friendster" is enough information to determine that the image is GFDL. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:19, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cmulhs gate.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure "Friendster" is enough information to determine that the image is GFDL. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:19, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ski boots.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

The image does seem to be taken from online (Looking at it, it's upload history) and with the claims that "Questacon" is the source and if thats the case then it's copyrighted (the image) to the Commonwealth of Australia. Bidgee (talk) 12:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Zeta Jones 66669113 400.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:38, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Was uploaded with the comment that it came from People.com and Google.com and was therefore public domain, which is an incorrect assumption. Can't find the exact image, but a couple that are very close are at http://www.wireimage.com/GalleryListing.asp?navtyp=gls====37653# and subject to copright Rossrs (talk) 15:41, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:La19812vid.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; for now- F ASTILY  (TALK) 01:46, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Unfree image that does not add to the understanding of the article and the specific frame is not discussed in the article. There is clearly no justification for hosting this non-free image and this appears to be being used for decoration Spartaz Humbug! 17:32, 10 January 2009 (UTC) - Kept - Wrong forum. Garion96 (talk) 14:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Image is correctly licensed as NFFU and has a FUR which lists the source as Virgin Records andi064 T . C 18:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Since the image is essentially decorative it does not meet the NFCC. Spartaz Humbug! 20:40, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Correct, but that's a reason to tag it with a variety of dnfcc. PUI doesn't deal with images that are admittedly non-free. Stifle (talk) 21:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LeeJunKi_Splendor.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace " " with the actual name of the image. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after " ". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUI or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:39, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

reason c.campbell 22:20, 10 January 2009 (UTC) This image is from Splendor Magazine in Korea. But it was scanned by a user in Dcjunki and has given users outside of Korea to distribute. It has also been distributed in an article as well. http://coolsmurf.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/lee-jun-ki-decides-to-be-a-hero-again/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colleen16 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 10 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LeeJunKi_Splendor.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace " " with the actual name of the image. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after " ". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUI or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:39, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

reason c.campbell 22:23, 10 January 2009 (UTC) This image is from Splendor Magazine in Korea. But it was scanned by a user in Dcjunki and has given users outside of Korea to distribute. It has also been distributed in an article as well. http://coolsmurf.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/lee-jun-ki-decides-to-be-a-hero-again/
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.