Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 January 19



File:Ashley_Olsen_Influence.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I doubt this is own work. See their upload log for more. Kanonkas : Talk  01:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Derivative from File:Olsen_twins.jpg
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Olsen_twins.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I doubt this is own work. See their upload log & talk for more info. Kanonkas : Talk  01:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Edit summaries where picture/derivatives added to articles say picture taken at a Barnes and Noble store in Los Angeles  but the image description pages say picture taken in a Barnes and Noble store in New York City  . --NrDg 17:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mary_Kate_Olsen_wac.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I doubt this is own work. See their upload log & talk for more info. Kanonkas : Talk  01:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ashley_Olsen_pho.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:10, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I doubt this is own work. See their upload log & talk for more info. Kanonkas : Talk  01:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * See |1&axs=0|81594531%2c81594522%2c81594521%2c81594465%2c81594464%2c81594463%2c81594462%2c81594460%2c81594458%2c81594456%2c81594454%2c81594408%2c81573268%2c81573267%2c81573260%2c82854845%2c82098368%2c81725663%2c81573909%2c81573904%2c81382040%2c81381982%2c81381980%2c81381891%2c81381887%2c81381058%2c81380887%2c81380595%2c81379991%2c81379976%2c81378063%2c81377956%2c81377917%2c81377916%2c81377914%2c81377912%2c81377838%2c81377830%2c81377827%2c81377478%2c81377475%2c81377304%2c81377280%2c81377279%2c81377276%2c81377274%2c81377273%2c81372923%2c81368661%2c81368659%2c81368637%2c81358352%2c81358351%2c81358350%2c81358344%2c81358342%2c81358340%2c81358336%2c81357964%2c81357610|360 Getty Images Presume lied about ownership of other images as well - didn't check. --NrDg 02:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mary-Kate_Olsen_wac.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I doubt this is own work. See their upload log & talk for more info. Kanonkas : Talk  01:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MATLAB-R2008a-for-Linux.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Resolved - License corrected  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 08:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

MATLAB is proprietary so this screenshoot cannot be free. Hidro (talk) 12:17, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I am the person who uploaded this picture. This is a snapshot of an proprietary softwrae. If we follow this argument, then all snapshots of proprietary software should be removed on Wikipedia and we can't show the interface of any proprietary software. I don't think this makes sense.
 * You can show the interface of any proprietary software by tagging it as "Non-free software screenshot" and adding a rational.

I have taken the liberty of preemptively making the changes.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 13:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ribosome.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Source link dead, nothing in web archive - no way to verify GFDL status Papa November (talk) 22:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I got it from Nupedia. Everything on Nupedia is GFDL.  —Dominus (talk) 02:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * See this discussion on commons about the image --IngerAlHaosului (talk) 13:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I hope we can keep this, but we still don't know the author, creation date etc. Papa November (talk) 09:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Boluda.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Looks like a screen capture -- lucasbfr  talk 23:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree change the license to and add a rational or delete, i recomand the later because correcting the license will make it a Orphaned fairuse images and eligible for deletion, either way it will be deleted.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 14:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.