Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 January 22



File:CWUWILDCATS.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:04, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Not a per-pixel equivalent but the same as File:CWUWILDCATS.png (and both are non-free images). Ricky81682 (talk) 06:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MET.300x250Romeo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:04, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Looks like CD cover multichill (talk) 21:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not a CD cover. It's an advertisment that was used by the New York Metropolitan Opera to publicize one of their HD broadcasts. It's no longer on the site, but here is a similar one with a very similar file name: . It's clearly a non-free image. Voceditenore (talk) 06:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cd_meltemi.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:04, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Looks like album cover multichill (talk) 21:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * It is an album cover. Published online in a Dutch newspaper (2006) here: and on the web site of the band here: . Unless the uploader is from the band and owns the copyright, it's not a free image. And if they were from the band, and wanted to release it under a free license why not use their own high resolution version. Voceditenore (talk) 09:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I noticed this discussion a bit late. Yes, I am from the band. Yes we own the copyright. Yes I even am the photographer. And yes, the paper you refer to got the photo from us. I'll upload a new version, however please check if I added the right license ;-) Didgeweb (talk) 11:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.