Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 January 26



File:Pdogs-love.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

No evidence of permission to use under GFDL. Nv8200p talk 01:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pdog04.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

No evidence of permission to use under GFDL. Nv8200p talk 01:11, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pdog001.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

No evidence of permission to use inder GFDL. Nv8200p talk 01:11, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Triple H 2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Image asserts that it's a self-created work, but it appears to be a resized image from a wwe.com page. Elkman (Elkspeak) 02:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Uploaded by indef blocked sockpuppeteer, blatant copyvio. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  18:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Celtic grounded.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Image was created in 1928 but uses the pre-1923 tag, which seems wrong. I'm guessing that the image is likely old enough to have passed into the public domain, but I cannot be 100% sure of this based on the information provided. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LeeJunKi BDAY.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Uploader claims to be the copyright holder but offers no evidence, and I find this claim rather dubious. PC78 (talk) 12:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok! Ok! It was taken by a friend, but she gave me permission to use it here. I can get an email as proof. Where can I post it? Colleen16 (talk) 8:00, 26 January 2009
 * The proof should be sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Stifle (talk) 17:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok it has been sent in. Colleen16 (talk) 21:44, 26 January 2009

Kept. Permission confirmed in OTRS.  howcheng  {chat} 23:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mary_Kate_Olsen_Influence.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:12, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I doubt this is own work. See their upload log & talk for more info Kanonkas : Talk  16:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Derivative from File:Olsen_twins.jpg, see also WP:Possibly_unfree_images/2009_January_19 --NrDg 18:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MN00627A.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 
 * There may be legitimate issues with the NI number, but the image is not unfree. – Quadell (talk) 04:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't think this is ineligible for copyright, and even if it was, revealing someone's NI number isn't best practice. Stifle (talk) 17:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note that it was a court exhibit. As Zacarias Moussaoui is currently serving life with no possibiliity of parole in a U.S. federal SuperMax for involvement in the September 11 attacks, it is doubtful that he will have any need for his NI number for the foreseeable future; nor that this is an identity anyone would particularly want to steal.


 * As to the copyright eligibility, it might be eligible in the U.K., where the standard of originality is very low; but I suspect it may be a fair call that it doesn't meet the standard of originality for U.S. copyright. Jheald (talk) 09:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The card doesn't meet the threshold for originality needed for copyright. The photograph itself would be PD-USGov. Per the Foundation's ruling on originality (regarding the applicability of the principles found in Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. for non-U.S. images), we go by the U.S. standard and not the standard of originality for the source country. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - It'd be really hard to replace this, it's a product of a government, taken by a government, and not a creative work. It's a matter of public record, and it would be hard to find someone who'd want to give a picture of their card up that isn't serving life in prison, so it's not really replaceable. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  22:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Under UK laws its illegal to distribute N.I numbers in this way, regardless of a persons background or current status. Sensitivity issues clearly arise regardless of copyright.CorrectlyContentious 16:02, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I know FFD is over there, but this image doesn't seem to really add much to the article in the first place. Also agree with the above that it probably isn't a good idea to reveal anyone's number, regardless of where they currently are. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:32, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Huizenga SchoolatNSU08.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:42, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Does not appear that the uploader is the copyright holder of this image. Stifle (talk) 17:43, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - What is your rationale for believing so? &mdash; neuro  (talk)  20:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Low-res, loooks like it could have been taken from the school's website. Stifle (talk) 19:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Uploader has not responded, it's replaceable, delete please. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  22:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Image_name.ext

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace " " with the actual name of the image. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after " ". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUI or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

reason Neslioner (talk) 20:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC) I am the copyright owner I register to Wikipedia my self also after this time I will upload about me every things. Should be no problem now please replace my file or give me instruction if my file already deleted I can upload again.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Image_name.ext

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace " " with the actual name of the image. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after " ". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUI or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

reason Neslioner (talk) 20:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC) I am the artist and copyright owner for Bizans Sentezi.jpg is there any other problem? Please let me know! Neslioner (talk) 20:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Atallah-Hanna.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Some issues here, it's tagged as PD but according to the permission statement on the image it's only "Free to use with acknowledgment." according to the Webmaster. If this means free to use, sell, modify and redistrubute or just literlay "free to use" is unclear (but either way it's not PD if attribution is required), also the actual author is unknown so unclear of the site the webmaster work for actualy have any rights to the image in the first place. Sherool (talk) 22:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.