Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 January 28



File:07122005(007).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

While the photograph itself is correctly licensed (probably), the focus and purpose of the image is to show the commentator of the monitor which is (most likely) copyrighted work. Mosmof (talk) 00:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CardsRetiredSTL.PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 
 * The result of the debate was keep -- Samir 07:26, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

This image is based on the wall of retired numbers at Busch stadium. While the background art has been removed, unlike the other retired numbers (see the gallery, St. Louis Cardinals), the cursive stylistic letterings might still be copyrightable. Jappalang (talk) 01:22, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Copyrightable in that it is similar in style to circa 1900-1920 Cardinals logo? Or because it is similar to the style of writing on the home run fence at Busch stadium?  -- Samir 02:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Typestyles are not copyrightable per Public domain. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:33, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, okay. I think this PUI can be closed out then.  I will tag this as PD-text.  Jappalang (talk) 04:37, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CardsRetiredMic.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Same reasoning as for the above CardsRetiredSTL.PNG, except that it is the microphone image in this case. Jappalang (talk) 01:22, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I see no reason to suspect that uploader did not draw the image of the microphone as is suggested. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I found the image on the wall here (oblique shot). Is it derivative or not?  Jappalang (talk) 04:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Can't see how the mic is derivative. Simplified image of a microphone drawn by the uploader. -- Samir 17:05, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, I just needed a second opinion. Withdrawing this request.  Jappalang (talk) 04:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Allynamm2009.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: - Withdrawn - thanks Guilty - licence is good now - Peripitus (Talk) 01:23, 31 January 2009 (UTC) Image page notes CC-3.0 but the flickr image has the copyright "Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 Generic" - as a non-commercial image it is not free Peripitus (Talk) 04:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Sent email to Flickr image's owner (http://flickr.com/people/synthesizers/) asking permission to use the image by changing the image's copyright from "Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 Generic" to "Attribution 3.0 Unported" Guilty (Talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 09:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC).
 * Received email permission from image's owner. Asked owner to update the image's Flickr page with creative commons license copyright "Attribution 3.0 Unported" in the Flickr page's description, as Flickr creative commons licensing options are very out-dated. guilty (talk) 19:22, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Received confirmation that image's author Synthtopia.com has manually modified the Flickr image's page http://flickr.com/photos/synthesizers/3205005347/ in its description to include the Creative Commons license "Attribution 3.0 Unported" and has given prior permission allowing the image to be used free on Wikipedia. Please provide feedback if this is sufficient verification of proper licensing. guilty (talk) 01:03, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Exterior of Shanghai Tower Burj Dubai Greenland Square Zifeng.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:05, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

It appears the author has used artists' impressions found elsewhere to put together each of these not-completed buildings in one picture. None of the images could possibly be photographs, as none of the buildings are that far progressed. -- timsdad  (talk) 09:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I've discovered a flickr picture here that appears to be the image in question (which the uploader has neglected to note that it is from flickr), and I am not sure if the copyright licenses still apply, as the photo is from flickr, but it looks as if the flickr user that created the image simply used the copyrighted artists' impressions of the buildings. Is the image in question suitable for use on Wikipedia? -- timsdad  (talk) 05:34, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Taylor kitsch 01.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Taken from http://handson.provocateuse.com/show/taylor_kitsch srushe (talk) 09:27, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Shartava sukhumi93.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

GFDL tagged but looks like a clear cut bad licensing from the uploader: he stated "Only for Wikipedia use, for permission please contact me" on the page -- lucasbfr  talk 18:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:GuyaneFlag.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 01:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Per Commons deletion log of a similar image and per fair-use criteria of the related Image:Logo 973 guyane.gif, I believe that this is a copyrighted image and should be minimal use (i.e. article of French Guiana only. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 19:41, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * You are correct, I think the flags are in the public domain, but the logos are copyrighted. File:Blason de la Guyane.svg should be used wherever possible. -- lucasbfr  talk 09:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I had already changed some templates yesterday (e.g. Template:Politics of French Guiana to use precisely that Commons image), so as soon as the job queue catches up, we can see how many instances of the non-free image remain. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 17:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This is now marked as fair use and as such is out of scope of PUI. If its use is excessive or otherwise contrary to the fair use rules, list it at WP:NFR or WP:FFD. Stifle (talk) 12:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Munsch-Hardt-logo.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G11 by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned. Article/Userpage containing it speedied. Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:30, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.