Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 January 4



January 4

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

delete copyright violation on flickr. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 20:56, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Karolína Kurková.jpeg
Flickr page from where the image came has the Noncommercial tag present. Tabercil (talk) 00:19, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Deleted as a copyright violation. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 20:56, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Liamcosgrave.jpg
derivative photo Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Oystercatcher79a.JPG
old image; why is this public domain? no explanation given. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:22, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Leah_03.jpg
Uploader unlikely to be copyright holder. Kelly hi! 06:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

It appears that taker of this pic snapped it at the same time that Remini was posing for another photographer in front of an emergency exit. Editor's copyright claim may be bogus (talk page show a mixed history with images) but I don't know that it is implausible. -  Ro   Bo   Tam   ice 17:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

File:PeelReport291.png
are documents created in 1930 by the UK Crown in the public domain? I can't find any evidence of this. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:45, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Crown Copyright only lasts for 50 years after publication, this entered the public domain in 1980. Switch it to PD-BritishGov. ViperSnake151 17:28, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Stifle (talk) 12:59, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Neotek.jpg
No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 17:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I am in the band and this is a press photo, so we have the agreement with the photographer Warren Prasek that we can use it everywhere. He is a good friend of the band so we credit him as often as we can (even though it is not necessary) - and we actually forgot this the first time around. Now he is credited. Cheers, (Cybersen (talk) 12:32, 20 January 2009 (UTC))

Hello, I am the photographer (Warren Prasek) and can verify that the band are very welcome to use this image for whatever purpose they see fit. I can be contacted to verify this via the email form on my website at www.wprasek.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.47.21 (talk) 12:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Cabbie2ipodvid.png
While the program may be free, the album art is not. ViperSnake151 17:21, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Normal SUITELIFEONDECK Y1 GAL 003.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Although the image uploaded came from a Disney Channel fansite, I also found the original without the fansite's tag on the website Disney uses to give copyrighted material to "qualified domestic media professionals only." You HAVE to be a member of the press and have a membership there to even GET the pictures. It's their way of knowing who exactly is using the pictures. Here is the closest I could get to getting the picture to show up because I have no membership there and have no reason to have a membership there. Purplewowies (talk) 19:58, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly a copyvio. --AussieLegend (talk) 07:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Deanhoward.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete. Andrew c [talk] 01:41, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Uploader scanned the image but is not likely to be the copyright holder. Garion96 (talk) 21:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Butlers Chocolates.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: delete.-Andrew c [talk] 01:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Uploader claims "own work"/"I am the copyright holder", when clearly it is an advertising image, and the copyright very likely belongs to the company/product owner in question. Guliolopez (talk) 21:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.