Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 January 5



File:Shags banner.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, image within this is most likely (c) (Austin Powers) Skier Dude  ( talk ) 00:24, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Shaider 02.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, appears to be video game screenshot, thus uploader not (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 00:25, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Shamsattari.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, no source, has (ec) watermark on bottom of image Skier Dude  ( talk ) 00:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Shaolin guariglia.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

orphaned book cover, uploader most likely not (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 00:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Shaq-fu.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, contains images and logos that are (c) Skier Dude  ( talk ) 00:31, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:TreeOfPhysiology.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Although this stated to be an ancient form the particular image was created contemporarily by "Romio Shrestha" (see http://romioshrestha.com/about-romio.htm). Unless this is a simple copy - which is seems to not be - this image is copyrighted not PD Peripitus (Talk) 03:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SlackersCDsandGames.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, picture of logo; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 06:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Six-Star-Logo-4-Colors.PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

orphaned, absent uploader, possible derivative of official logo Skier Dude  ( talk ) 06:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:FaceKooLogo.png
logo of website; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Wcam (talk) 07:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Please don't delete the image. It's owned by me (I'm one of the owners of FaceKoo) and I'm releasing this to the public domain.

Davidyan74 (talk) 07:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

The above is from my talk page.--Wcam (talk) 07:41, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * We'd need OTRS confirmation or there needs to be a note on the webpage stating how the logo is licensed. I'll leave a note for David Yan.-Andrew c [talk] 15:18, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

The above is from my talk page.--Wcam (talk) 05:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * There is an OTRS ticket about this at 2331432. It has been replied to in order to request clarification. Stifle (talk) 10:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * PD release confirmed; this image can be Stifle (talk) 11:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Porkers.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Image is a screencap from Parrot Island, an episode of The Suite Life on Deck and is not free, despite the uploader's license. It does not identify a character in the program and could easily be replaced with a generic, free picture of a pig. The same, or another extremely similar image (Image:PorkersPickett.png), was previously deleted in October 2008 for these reasons. AussieLegend (talk) 08:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Illus-050-1-.jpg
Using http://tineye.com I've found that this image occurs at http://www.allposters.com/-sp/Queen-of-Henry-II-Posters_i1881031_.htm. However, that site doesn't have the uploaded resolution and is protected by a watermark.. The uploaded version is also missing some stuff at the bottom. Anyway, I've asked the uploader to clarify. eug (talk) 12:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Image may be 19th century but may be newer.Geni 13:41, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * PD-Old I think. Print is designed by J W Wright though I don't know who engraved it - he was publishing engravings as early as 1835 so I would expect it is now PD. Probably dates prior to 1865. - Peripitus (Talk) 20:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Stifle (talk) 12:43, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I've changed it to PD-old eug (talk) 09:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

File:M ffbf7f4b94d33f58c1123f5df8783899.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Unused image. Marked as Owned by CB, fair use for promotion" but licensed under a CCL. Because of recent image deletion discussions this image is being sent here for community discussion. The discussions point out that :
 * 1) An individual (Admin or not) should not be allowed to decide what is deleted (i.e - doing a CSD)
 * 2) Images eligible for deletion that may not be useful in any currently existing article, but for which an article may be written in the future should be kept
 * 3) Any free image that meets Commons:Project Scope should be moved to Commons.
 * 4) All unused images should be sent to IFD or PUI Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:59, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:M0708 Hart Senate Office Building 03.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Unused image. Summary says "Photo by Vic Reinhart". Uploder uses the "I, the copyright holder of this work..." with a CCL. User also uploaded File:Protestors marching towards IRS Building.jpg which says "Photo by Kathy Doucette" and used the same "I, the copyright holder of this work..." CCL. Because of recent image deletion discussions this image is being sent here for community discussion. The discussions point out that :
 * 1) An individual (Admin or not) should not be allowed to decide what is deleted (i.e - doing a CSD)
 * 2) Images eligible for deletion that may not be useful in any currently existing article, but for which an article may be written in the future should be kept
 * 3) Any free image that meets Commons:Project Scope should be moved to Commons.
 * 4) All unused images should be sent to IFD or PUI Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:07, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:M27.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Unused image. Seems to be a small image of a CD cover that has been deleted in the past but re-upped. Summary information on image is for an older image of the M27 Nebula. (Nebula Image exists as File:M27FirstLight.jpg) Because of recent image deletion discussions this image is being sent here for community discussion. The discussions point out that :
 * 1) An individual (Admin or not) should not be allowed to decide what is deleted (i.e - doing a CSD)
 * 2) Images eligible for deletion that may not be useful in any currently existing article, but for which an article may be written in the future should be kept
 * 3) Any free image that meets Commons:Project Scope should be moved to Commons.
 * 4) All unused images should be sent to IFD or PUI Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:C lear.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:52, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Unused image. Looks like a small image of a CD cover. Licensed under  GFDL. Because of recent image deletion discussions this image is being sent here for community discussion. The discussions point out that :
 * 1) An individual (Admin or not) should not be allowed to decide what is deleted (i.e - doing a CSD)
 * 2) Images eligible for deletion that may not be useful in any currently existing article, but for which an article may be written in the future should be kept
 * 3) Any free image that meets Commons:Project Scope should be moved to Commons.
 * 4) All unused images should be sent to IFD or PUI Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:33, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:C4Klogo.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Unused and orphaned image left over from the deletion of the Colour4kids article on June 28, 2007. While it is a logo the summary says it was created by the uploader and it is licensed under GFDL and CCL  Because of recent image deletion discussions this image is being sent here for community discussion. The discussions point out that :
 * 1) An individual (Admin or not) should not be allowed to decide what is deleted (i.e - doing a CSD)
 * 2) Images eligible for deletion that may not be useful in any currently existing article, but for which an article may be written in the future should be kept
 * 3) Any free image that meets Commons:Project Scope should be moved to Commons.
 * 4) All unused images should be sent to IFD or PUI Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mafaism7a-web.jpg
Uploaded from website. Permission listed appears to apply to the text on linked-to page, not to images on the entire site. →Wordbuilder (talk) 16:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * (I don't know the process or etiquette here, there's no example of a discussion to follow, and there's no obvious "help" page. Please provide a link to more information on the process, etc.)


 * The statement: "Permission listed appears to apply to the text on linked-to page, not to images on the entire site." is an opinion without any supporting evidence, not a fact. My opinion is that the permission listed is applicable. There is no mention of copyright anywhere on the site, except on the quoted page, and the statement on the quoted page says: "All Rights NOT Reserved, 2007". Note: ALL rights.
 * The opinion "Permission listed appears ... " is implying/deducing that some rights are reserved - that is not what the statement says; repeating myself, the statement says ALL rights NOT reserved. Pdfpdf (talk) 17:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not questioning the statement "All Rights NOT Reserved". It's just not clear that it applies to more of the site than just the page it appears on. Also, there is no need for the site to specify copyright. Copyright is automatically granted. The solution offered below by is the best to ensure that there is no infringement here. →Wordbuilder (talk) 20:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * One of the easiest ways to resolve this may be to write to the webmaster, mrginc@aol.com, and ask him to specify. If he wants to tweak that release from "Maf. Divine Mafa, All Rights NOT Reserved, 2007" to specify that it includes all text and images on the site, then there's no issue. He can also verify permission through the regular procedure at Donating copyrighted materials. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Iam the web master for mafaism.com, all rights include images- not reserved. thanks- mrginc@aol.com for details if needed.

File:CA Royalty Free License June2006 NanoMark DOC-062106 A.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Unused and orphaned image of a press release that was added to the Firearm microstamping article but removed as being one of the "POV additions" added to the article on February 1, 2007. See also unused and orphaned images: File:ID Dyna Microstamping 3rd Generation.JPG, File:ID Dyna Microstamping 3rdGeneration2.JPG and File:ID Dyna Microstamping 3rd Generation3.JPG.<BR> Because of recent image deletion discussions these images are being sent here for community discussion. The discussions point out that :
 * 1) An individual (Admin or not) should not be allowed to decide what is deleted (i.e - doing a CSD)
 * 2) Images eligible for deletion that may not be useful in any currently existing article, but for which an article may be written in the future should be kept
 * 3) Any free image that meets Commons:Project Scope should be moved to Commons.
 * 4) All unused images should be sent to IFD or PUI Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CA-00AndroidPsycoShockerPara.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Unused image. Summary simply says "all me". When the image had been used in the Settling the Score article it was described as a "Jinzo playing card" This image was replaced by File:Yugioh108.jpg (which was deleted for "Fair Use Violations"). <BR> Because of recent image deletion discussions this image is being sent here for community discussion. The discussions point out that :
 * 1) An individual (Admin or not) should not be allowed to decide what is deleted (i.e - doing a CSD)
 * 2) Images eligible for deletion that may not be useful in any currently existing article, but for which an article may be written in the future should be kept
 * 3) Any free image that meets Commons:Project Scope should be moved to Commons.
 * 4) All unused images should be sent to IFD or PUI Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:22, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CAGFACE.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned, and unused, image from the CSD A7 deletion of the CAG the music artist article on April 13, 2008. Because of recent image deletion discussions this image is being sent here for community discussion. The discussions point out that :
 * 1) An individual (Admin or not) should not be allowed to decide what is deleted (i.e - doing a CSD)
 * 2) Images eligible for deletion that may not be useful in any currently existing article, but for which an article may be written in the future should be kept
 * 3) Any free image that meets Commons:Project Scope should be moved to Commons.
 * 4) All unused images should be sent to IFD or PUI Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:41, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CAl.PNG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Unused image. Uploader claims to be the creator of this logo/banner for Cal State Poly. Current version of the California State Polytechnic University, Pomona article uses File:Cal Poly Pomona seal.png under a claim of Fair Use. Rather than swaping out this free version with the unfree version, because of recent image deletion discussions, this image is being sent here for community discussion. The discussions point out that :
 * 1) An individual (Admin or not) should not be allowed to decide what is deleted (i.e - doing a CSD)
 * 2) Images eligible for deletion that may not be useful in any currently existing article, but for which an article may be written in the future should be kept
 * 3) Any free image that meets Commons:Project Scope should be moved to Commons.
 * 4) All unused images should be sent to IFD or PUI Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CBSlogo.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Unused image. This is the CBS "eye" logo and the summary says "It was vectorised, and recreated to a bigger and higher quality version." The uploader claims to be the author via the "I, the creator of this work..." GFDL license. However, based on their users other uploads and their talk page comments they may not have created this. <BR>Because of recent image deletion discussions this image is being sent here for community discussion. The discussions point out that :
 * 1) An individual (Admin or not) should not be allowed to decide what is deleted (i.e - doing a CSD)
 * 2) Images eligible for deletion that may not be useful in any currently existing article, but for which an article may be written in the future should be kept
 * 3) Any free image that meets Commons:Project Scope should be moved to Commons.
 * 4) All unused images should be sent to IFD or PUI Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:UNK-f.jpg
Tagged, but a watermark in the lower right corner of the image says, "Photo courtesy Alaska DOT, Fairbanks", which would seem to be an Alaska state agency, not a United States federal agency. —Bkell (talk) 18:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Seems like the overlaid image was done by the Alaska Department of Transportation. The "source" of the image shows it was obtained from the FAA website at alaska.faa.gov, which would explain why it says "Photo courtesy Alaska DOT, Fairbanks" on it. Form what I can tell the PD-USGov-FAA is incorrect. According to Alaska DOT website Copyright information "The Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities’ authority to claim copyright protection for its original works of authorship derives from (Alaska Statutes) AS 16.05.050(2), 16.05.050(8), and AS 44.99.400." So this image would not fall under PD. Their copyright info also says "If you are not sure whether the Fair Use provision of the Copyright Act would allow copying a needed item or material, request copies or copying permission from the department." If the image does not meet our criteria someone email andrea_paulick [at] dot.state.ak.us per the DOT information. Soundvisions1 (talk) 18:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm, my guess was that the photograph was produced by Alaska DOT, and the overlaid text was added by the FAA, but again that's only an unfounded guess. Anyway, the ideal solution would be to figure out which agency produced the photograph and which agency added the text, and then request permission from the appropriate agency to have the image released under a free license or into the public domain. —Bkell (talk) 19:41, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

File:CCSF logo-color.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Unused and orphaned image of a GFDL logo uploaded for use in a 2007 article that may never have gotten past the sandbox: "Children’s Council of San Francisco"] - Template:X1, November 1, 2007.<BR>Unused image. Because of recent image deletion discussions this image is being sent here for community discussion. The discussions point out that :
 * 1) An individual (Admin or not) should not be allowed to decide what is deleted (i.e - doing a CSD)
 * 2) Images eligible for deletion that may not be useful in any currently existing article, but for which an article may be written in the future should be kept
 * 3) Any free image that meets Commons:Project Scope should be moved to Commons.
 * 4) All unused images should be sent to IFD or PUI Soundvisions1 (talk) 18:25, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rayo withanage.jpg
Poorly sourced professional image.  MBisanz  talk 18:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC)