Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 June 10



File:Manchester Titans Roster.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Based on the uploaders statement and Andrew's observations I have come to the conclution that this is in all likelyhood created by the uploader as claimed. The image should probably be deleted anyway because I have now replaced it with a wikitext table version of itself in the article, but beeing a tad pedantic I opted to close this as keep and then list it on WP:FFD for this different reason since there is no particular rush. --Sherool (talk) 13:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Odd things going on with this image: it was originally not tagged, then changed to a non-free web screenshot. When it was tagged for a missing rationale, the licensing changed again to GFDL-self. Probably not the uploader's own creation. (ESkog)(Talk) 00:12, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * This diff may be relevant, a comment from the uploader on my Talk page. (ESkog)(Talk) 00:31, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * If you look at the file history, there are multiple versions where the rows and order have been altered. While it is plausible that a website might update content like this, and a user download those files multiple times, it seems more plausible to me that this image is user created, and the multiple drafts is indicative of that. -Andrew c [talk] 14:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sheikh Mujib and Tanaka.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Looks like an old photograph, claimed as uploader's own work which seems unlikely given the subject matter (ESkog)(Talk) 00:53, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Suriya Sadashiva Temple.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I can't find an original source, but the border and the Photoshop metadata are characteristic of an image being taken from somewhere else on the web. (ESkog)(Talk) 06:44, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Hungarian public domain photographs

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Not applicable; please nominate each image for deletion separately, so that they can be discussed, rather than asking admins who might not know as much about the copyright issues to look through it. Thanks! –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 14:22, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

The old version of Template:PD-Hungary (I have now corrected the template) was apparently based on the copyright act of 1921, which was superseded by the 1994 and 1999 acts which changed protection of all photographs to death+70 retroactively (this included already PD photographs becoming once again copyrighted). The category should be reviewed; it is full of unfree images. --Tgr (talk) 12:16, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Aloha single artwork1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I doubt this (unused) album cover is released under a CC license. J Milburn (talk) 12:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

I am the copyright owner of the artwork and I consented for it to be used on this site. I Sim
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Travis Boak (right) with one of his fans.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Obvious photoshop fake, probably a derivative copyvio from http://www.essendonfc.com.au/images/06/draft06-Travis-Boak.jpg

No value to the Boak article. The-Pope (talk) 13:17, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Belgian fault lines.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete: There is a copyright notice in this image using the same name as the uploader's username and no indication the image has any permission for use. ww2censor (talk) 13:36, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Splash aloha promo1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

reason this image is non-free M aen K. A.  Talk  15:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

I am the copyright owner of the artwork and I consented for it to be used on this site. I Sim —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iainsim (talk • contribs) 08:42, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Maja ross andres salvador the dance princess on the generation.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

reason this image is non-free M aen K. A.  Talk  16:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mir Lawang Khan's Tomb.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Looks to be a very old picture, probably scanned. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this work. J Milburn (talk) 18:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mir Lawang Khan.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

According to our article, the subject died in the early seventies. This looks to be scanned, I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this work. J Milburn (talk) 18:36, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mir Gul Khan Ataullah Mir Ghaus Bakhsh Bugti.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Looks to have been scanned, possibly from a newspaper. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 18:37, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jalib.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Suspicious image. I doubt the uploader owns the rights, possibly taken from elsewhere on the 'net. J Milburn (talk) 18:38, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mir Gul Khan With Ata.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Clearly a scan of a much older photograph. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 18:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.