Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 June 15



File:Kristin-chenowith-tonys-de-77197733.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Manifestly nonfree image taken from Harper's, while a free image of Chenowith exists at File:Kristin Chenoweth at the Oxford Union 1.jpg Tim Pierce (talk) 03:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jillphillips.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Alleged source does not contain this image. No evidence that copyright holder has released this. Ecosse99 (talk) 04:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sheng Jing Hospital Logo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep and retagged as fair-use. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 14:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Logo M aen K. A.  Talk  09:48, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

LogoUser:Denimedger Hey The logo Is the work of The hospital.I work at the hospital and have sole permission to promote its use... —Preceding undated comment added 01:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC).
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Itclogo-2009.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Logo M aen K. A.  Talk  09:48, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mansionarkansas.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

The photo looks professional and I suspect it is copyrighted, as the justification of public domain status is confused. The photo was uploaded with statement "This comes from the State of Arkansas" which conflicts with simultaneous use of the U.S. Federal government tag whose boilerplate asserts: "Public domain: This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States Federal Government under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. See Copyright." It appears the uploader believed that state government is same as Federal government. I understand that U.S. Federal work is public domain, but state work is copyrighted by default. No webpage source is identified. I browsed some in an Arkansas state website at http://www.arkansasgovernorsmansion.com/index.html to look for it but have not found it. doncram (talk) 12:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Solomon poster.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Film poster M aen K. A.  Talk  12:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Quite obviously a non-free image. —  Σ xplicit  04:39, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Seleccionperu.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

I doubt that this is the uploader's own work. J Milburn (talk) 20:34, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

It's not my work, obviously. That's why I put the author's name, User:JCSwayne, in the author's section of the picture when I uploaded the file. This image you challenge comes from this file, (you can access it through wikipedia's search box), but I was not able to upload it directly on to that destination as for some reason it did not allow me to upload an updated copy.--&#91;&#124;!*//MarshalN20\\*!&#124;&#93; (talk) 20:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

When exactly is anyone going to re-consider the decision? The article where the picture is currently at is in the middle of an FA review, and the current tag on the picture is being mentioned as a a reason for opposition. The main question remains: Why submit an image for discussion if you're not even going to be present at the discussion?--&#91;&#124;!*//MarshalN20\\*!&#124;&#93; (talk) 19:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, seems reasonable- at first I thought maybe the original upload was dubious, but it seems legit. I normally don't check back to these discussions unless messaged, as I can't watchlist individual discussions, and normally, no one replies anyway. The discussion would be closed in a few days, but you can consider my nomination withdrawn. J Milburn (talk) 20:57, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your explanation, and now I understand why you did not reply earlier. Thanks again.--&#91;&#124;!*//MarshalN20\\*!&#124;&#93; (talk) 21:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sandalwoodsaintslogo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Presumably a copyrighted logo. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yes, clearly, which makes me wonder why the nsd was declined.  It has a source but it's far from believable.   Wknight94  talk  00:37, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Eh, just don't want to get people all angry at me for deleting a sourced image as not having a source, even if it is obviously incorrect. Deleting now, since there seems to be no opposition. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.