Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 June 18



File:TheHappyGang-display CBCMuseum.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Kept. Your choice of expired crown copyright or FOP. Stifle (talk) 22:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

A photograph of a museum exhibit belongs to the museum and/or the original publisher, not the photographer. Mosmof (talk) 00:28, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The subject of the image is an enlarged photograph from the Television show The Happy Gang. This show was broadcast by the CBC until 1959. As the CBC is a governmental organization, the elements of this image are expired Crown Copyright per PD-Canada. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Is there any distinction between intellectual property that belongs to a crown corporation, which CBC is, versus a government agency? We are talking about a corporate entity, even if it's owned by the government. Also, could the copyright belong to a production company that is separate from CBC? --Mosmof (talk) 22:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It was my intention to take a photograph to show the Happy Gang exhibit at the museum; not any one piece but I acknowledge that the blow-up photo backdrop does predominate. Nevertheless, I don't think that it's a copy of the photograph. For one thing, it's horribly blurry. For another, it's partially obscured by the display case. It's acceptable to use a photo of a shop with its logo prominently displayed and this seems to me a similar, though not identical issue. It is not a copy of the photograph, it's a photo of the exhibit that includes a large photo backdrop. Double Blue  (talk) 21:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think that the CBC can qualify as a Crown Copyright. The broadcasts were not directly under Crown Copyrights but rather by CBC copyrights. Double Blue  (talk) 21:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * CBC is a Crown Corporation, of course it was under Crown Copyright (which has now expired). IronGargoyle (talk) 15:19, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree with DoubleBlue that this is an image of a 3D exhibit on permanent public display, and as such, Freedom of Panorama applies.--Skeezix1000 (talk) 21:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Very true. In addition to the image being in the public domain, Canadian Freedom of Panorama is quite broad. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Clasico regiomontano.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Obviously this image was made using two copyrighted and unfree files (File:Monterrey.PNG and File:Tigreslogo.png). random numbers (talk) 18:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Exposing lower lateral cartilage during rhinoplasty.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete: Source indicates this image comes from a site that claims copyright to all its content but uploader claims it is a freely licenced (cc) image. ww2censor (talk) 21:02, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I am the owner of this image, and have re-uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons so that I can use it on multiple Wikimedia projects. I am not opposed to the image being deleted at Wikipedia and using the Wikimedia Commons image for all articles that reference it.  So, do what needs to be done. Thanks. Paravis (talk) 22:49, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mid facelift (rhytidectomy) lower incision.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:18, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete: Source indicates this image comes from a site that claims copyright to all its content but uploader claims it is a freely licenced (cc) image. ww2censor (talk) 21:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I am the owner of this image, and have re-uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons so that I can use it on multiple Wikimedia projects. I am not opposed to the image being deleted at Wikipedia and using the Wikimedia Commons image for all articles that reference it.  So, do what needs to be done. Thanks. Paravis (talk) 22:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mid facelift (rhytidectomy) upper incision.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete: Source indicates this image comes from a site that claims copyright to all its content but uploader claims it is a freely licenced (cc) image. ww2censor (talk) 21:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I am the owner of this image, and have re-uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons so that I can use it on multiple Wikimedia projects. I am not opposed to the image being deleted at Wikipedia and using the Wikimedia Commons image for all articles that reference it.  So, do what needs to be done. Thanks. Paravis (talk) 22:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Upper eyelid blepharoplasty incision.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete: Source indicates this image comes from a site that claims copyright to all its content but uploader claims it is a freely licenced (cc) image. ww2censor (talk) 21:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I am the owner of this image, and have re-uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons so that I can use it on multiple Wikimedia projects. I am not opposed to the image being deleted at Wikipedia and using the Wikimedia Commons image for all articles that reference it.  So, do what needs to be done. Thanks. Paravis (talk) 22:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Fat removal using cannula during tumescent liposuction.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete: Source indicates this image comes from a site that claims copyright to all its content but uploader claims it is a freely licenced (cc) image. ww2censor (talk) 21:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I am the owner of this image, and have re-uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons so that I can use it on multiple Wikimedia projects. I am not opposed to the image being deleted at Wikipedia and using the Wikimedia Commons image for all articles that reference it.  So, do what needs to be done. Thanks. Paravis (talk) 22:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.