Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 June 27



File:Arabellafield.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Claimed as self-made but the image is used widely on the internet which makes me strongly doubt this Peripitus (Talk) 00:39, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete copyright violation from IMDB. -- Kanonkas : Talk  16:15, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hawksrfc1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

No source and no evidence that copyright holder has released this. Ecosse99 (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Horsa 3-view.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Failed to use OTRS, website contains no release. No evidence of purported email permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 07:48, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Home 4.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

No source and no evidence that copyright holder has released this. Ecosse99 (talk) 07:54, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Allachbronzwflag.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Retagged as unfree. -Andrew c [talk] 00:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Contradictory licencing information: the infobox makes reference to fair use (albeit without a proper rationale), but the copyright tag is PD-self, which is patently incorrect. Moreover, a fair use claim would not work under WP:NFCC, because presumably it is possible to take freely licenced photos of this artifact.

Note: All image uploads of this user,, seem to have this problem. This notice applies to all of them; this image is listed only as an example.  Sandstein  16:28, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Not all images uploaded my myself have this problem. Many are created by myself and I am the copyright holder. A few others were created by another person that has given me full permission to use the images as I see fit for whatever purpose. I am however working to fix the copyright tags on the images that have problems. I just didn’t know what copyright tag needed to be used because nobody has been telling me how to do things. All my efforts have been through trial and error. I only hope I have found the proper tag for the image in question because it is historically important and relevant to the article that it is included in. I would maybe like to have help fixing the problems if someone can help me. If the images get deleted it would very much so hurt the content and understsnding of the articles that they are in.
 * ">[[User:Nicholasweed|> 14:52, 02 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:3CT YA.jpg.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete: This book cover is copyright and cannot be put in the public domain by the uploader, so it is an unused orphan. ww2censor (talk) 17:03, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:3CT YA.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete: This book cover is copyright and cannot be put in the public domain by the uploader, so it is an unused orphan. ww2censor (talk) 17:03, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Michael Jackson's difference in appearance.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Image is all over the web, including from. Uploader is clearly not the copyright holder. This image is displayed on a high-profile page, and should be dealt with swiftly. Brianga (talk) 20:23, 27 June 2009 (UTC) Brianga (talk) 20:23, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Adriankellard.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Image has been deleted twice already. Uploader clearly is not the author. He even admitted working on permission for uploaded image. Wknight94 talk  20:57, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Japan0205.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Image includes Japanese posters used in the Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (film) article. The uploader (Stevec240) says the image is his copyright. However, the photographed posters are probably Warner Bros' Non-free posters and the rationale for fair use in the article not obvious, because the article text doesn't mention Japan or Tokyo. Uploader hasn't contributed since 2007 so might not respond to messages. Pointillist (talk) 22:32, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.