Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 June 28



File:Cincy montage.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

"Google"? It is a source, so it isn't speedy-able, but it's only barely better then no source at all. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Downtownsariverlevel.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Like the last image, has a source, but its only barely better than no source at all without more information. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:52, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:GerardRed.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Image at source is not the same as this image, so license cannot be verified. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * As the uploader of the image, I am fine with it's deletion.  The Flash  {talk} 03:21, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sign-m-sml.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 19:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Are signatures PD-ineligible? –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, this has been upheld many times--both here and on Commons. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Very good then; thanks for the info. I'll keep it in mind. Withdrawn. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 19:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ross Newell.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

No source and no evidence of permission (an unused image of a non-notable person). Memphisto (talk) 10:54, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RookeShieldsBackontheBoards008-vi1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

I can't see this being self made. Gordonrox24 ''' &#124; Talk 16:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Uploader says the source is photobucket.com, but also seems to say he found it somewhere (rather than took it) and is unable to find an explicit release of copyrights. This image is all over the internet, so it's possibly impossible to pin down its original. and it's hardly a unique image or a case where this exact one must be used in this context. Someone could upload a personally-taken photo as a free replacement or make a fair-use claim of a screen-cap (whose origin is traceable) for the person in his iconic role. DMacks (talk) 16:32, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Why can't this be self made? It seems to be a convention setting, and a consumer quality camera. Mintrick (talk) 16:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * FWIW, I've replaced the image in the Billy Mays article with one that's clearly under a cc-by-sa-2.0 license. travisl (talk) 17:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Image of Billy Mays is now considered unable to be reproduced, qualifying it for possible fair use. Mghabmw (talk) 18:19, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Acehood.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Looks like a professionally taken photo; no evidence that the user owns the copyrights to the image —  Σ xplicit  19:29, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:JerseyPants.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Uploader has history of copyvio uploads. Nothing to indicate this is an original work, especially as it is claimed to be from 2005, yet appears to be from the 70s or 80s. Mosmof (talk) 19:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gearheads01.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Uploader has history of copyvio uploads, nothing to indicate this is any different. Mosmof (talk) 19:33, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:WideBandJockstrap.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Uploader has history of copyvio uploads, nothing to indicate this is any different. Mosmof (talk) 19:33, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Danhardyweighin.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Web resolution, previosly uploaded to Flickr by "Outlaw Imaging" (account no longer active, but image can be seen here). One of the users other uploads confirmed copyvio. -- aktsu (t / c) 20:03, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bnnmbvhmkgh.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Web-resolution, no EXIF-data. Possibly from a video as it is very pixelated. User already uploaded at least one copyvio. -- aktsu (t / c) 20:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.