Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 June 30



File:OFK Beograd 1 0 Auxerre.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete. (ESkog)(Talk) 11:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Sourced to uploader, but A) lowish resolution for a self-taken photo, B) No metadata, and C) TinEye turns up another site with similar images. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:23, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jerimiahpose.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete. (ESkog)(Talk) 11:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Declined F4, since tag was added after nomination. Should have a direct URL with information on licensing... right now there doesn't seem to be any evidence of permission. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rover 400 (1991).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Looks pretty professional/promotional; no metadata; lower resolution than many photos taken by camera and not resized specifically for web use. Suspect copyvio. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:34, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The reason why there is no metadata is because I created this photograph a long time ago and cannot accurately give the camera info for this image. This was also added just after I joined wikipedia and didn't know very much about uploading photographs to it as a consequence of this. Please can you tell me about the type of licence that this image will need to remain on wikipedia, as is in use in the article Rover 400 Series as the only uploaded picture of the original Rover 400 model. Dreamweaverjack (talk) 03:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I look and don't see an original photo. I see evidence of reproduction from a printed source. Looking at your other images File:Morris Minor MM Series.jpg, File:Leyland P76.jpg..I see evidence of a misunderstanding about what self-made really means here - Peripitus (Talk) 23:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I thought that any image which was edited using editing software, became a unique image and was therefore under my copyright, which I allowed to be used on wikipedia. I do understand that if the image is resized and of a lower resolution quality then it can be used without infringing the copyright on it. Dreamweaverjack (talk) 00:25, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * That is a common misconception (my first upload had the same issue). Please read derivative work. Simple editing, resizing, cropping, colour changes etc... do not remove the original copyright. The images remain copyrighted to the creator. - Peripitus (Talk) 00:45, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pichonbaron97.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete. (ESkog)(Talk) 11:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

The label is presumably copyrighted, making this a derivative work. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Macdonald Memorial.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 03:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

The United States doesn't have freedom of panorama, so unless this memorial is out of copyright due to age (certainly possible) or a specific release (unlikely), this is a derivative work with copyright being held by the memorial's builder. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Why do you assume that this was taken in the United States? Sir. John A. Macdonald was Canadian. Canada has much more liberal FoP than the USA. Furthermore, he died in 1891. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:36, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oops! Good point. I hadn't thought about checking the sculptor's date of death. Withdrawn. Thanks! –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 03:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Image_name.ext

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace " " with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after " ". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

reason Jayzames (talk) 02:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

This is from a flier distributed at the protests
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Terrapene ornata face.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted no evidence that uploader have the rights to release the image. --Sherool (talk) 22:22, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

"I think this image is a copyright violation, despite the tag, unless the uploader is the owner. -Falcon8765 (talk) 03:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)"

The image is marked with a copyright tag in the top left, and is said to be taken from the Texas Park and Wildlife website. No evidence that the author, Roland311 has the permission to post this material to the public domain. NW ( Talk ) 04:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Image_name.ext

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace " " with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after " ". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

reason Nicholasweed (talk) 06:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC) This photo file should not be deleted because of “Fair use, Images with iconic status or historical importance: As subjects of commentary.” This is important to show this photo in the article because it is of the only known bronze cast Allach SS Flag Bearer by Theodor Karner. This item came out of the personal estate of Industrialist Franz Nagy had owned the land since 1925 that the Munich-Allach facility was built on. Nagy helped creat the porcelain factory Porzellan Manufaktur Allach. Examples of porcelain Allach SS Flag Bearer by Theodor Karner can still be found for sale for around $20,000 if one comes up for sale. This is the only one that might have been cast in bronze at all. It would be a shame to have this photo of this one of a kind artwork deleted from this article.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mia Michaels2007.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete uploader have uploaded several other promo shots claimed as his own, some patent copyvios based on copyright info embeded in the EXIF data (this one was stipped of EXIF info though). If uploader rely is the copyright holder furher evidence would be required to be plausable. --Sherool (talk) 22:44, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Listed as PD-self but this is a professional image that I can see copies of in various places on the internet including a low-res version here. I may be wrong but I don't think that the uploader owns this photo....if they do my sincerest thanks for uploading such a stunning image Peripitus (Talk) 06:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Studioa thumb.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted missing evidence of permission, image is part of the rotation on http://www.nrgrecording.com/studio.php?id=1 by the way, not the URL below. --Sherool (talk) 23:14, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

http://www.nrgrecording.com/studio.php?id=3 Abigor (talk) 08:18, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Studio C thumb.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted missing evidence of permission. --Sherool (talk) 23:11, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

http://www.nrgrecording.com/studio.php?id=3 Abigor (talk) 08:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Studio b live room thumb.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted missing evidence of permission. --Sherool (talk) 23:10, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

http://www.nrgrecording.com/studios.php Abigor (talk) 08:20, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:BBC_satellite_regions.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. --Sherool (talk) 23:10, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Image is listed as both PD and GFDL, claimed to be from ukfree.tv but no licensing confirmation is available there. I can't even find the original image URL to be honest. This is a useful image but if we can't figure out where it came from or whether it's properly licensed we might have to scrap it. RabidDeity (talk) 08:39, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Strike this, I miscategorized it. RabidDeity (talk) 08:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hairdo.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete. (ESkog)(Talk) 11:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Image also appears in a different format here. Without further provenance I think this is not user-taken Peripitus (Talk) 12:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Santos jack.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete. (ESkog)(Talk) 11:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Professional image uploaded by a user who has taken images from various soccer websites. Web resolution, professional quality, no exif, past history.....I don't think this is self-made nor public domain Peripitus (Talk) 12:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SK book cover 8.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. The filename is a bit odd, but the surrounding evidence all points to a free image. No compelling reason to believe otherwise. (ESkog)(Talk) 23:58, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

File would seem to be a scan from a book according to the file's title. If so, it appears to be a recent book which surely wouldn't be public domain. If the uploader is the author of the book and the person in the image, he needs to provide permission to OTRS. Image is also orphaned. Uploader also originally uploaded the same image 12 minutes later at File:SKPhoto.jpg. - ALLST✰R ▼ echo wuz here 18:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: appears to be a photograph of Sebastian Kappen. To expand on the "personal collection" comment, see the comment on the most recent file that was uploaded: "I am Dr. Sebastian Kappen's nephew and this photo of his is from my personal collection of photos. Prof. Sebastian Vattamattam". It should also be pointed out, for what it's worth, that this photo represents one of several GFDL-significant contributions by the uploader User:Ase, a username the nominator is presently attempting to usurp. –<b style="font-family:verdana; color:black;">xeno</b><sup style="color:black; font-family:verdana;">talk 18:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Nice and interesting find. Wouldn't the image still not be in the public domain if it was the cover of a book? Wouldn't his nephew need to provide OTRS? No problems with withdrawing this if these questions can be satisfied. Not sure what the usurp has to do with it. Not a conspiracy here, I just noticed the issue I've raised while looking at the account's edits and contributions. - ALLST✰R ▼ echo wuz here 19:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Not sure, I'll leave that to those more capable in copyright venues. However, it doesn't look like a book cover, it was perhaps just mis-named. –<b style="font-family:verdana; color:black;">xeno</b><sup style="color:black; font-family:verdana;">talk 19:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Can of White Fungus.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted per below. --Sherool (talk) 23:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

The moire effect and color/contrast give it away: this image was obviously ripped from TV. No attribution information is given in the description. The image has been uploaded before as both Image:White Fungus Can Image.jpg and Image:Can of White Fungus.jpeg. These images were flagged as unlicensed and unattributed back on January 1, 2009, before both were apparently deleted. (See . RabidDeity (talk) 20:42, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ancient nubians.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Uploader of this file has 10 counts of copyvios and this file looks most certainly like another one of them as it is lacking the written proof of permission sought from the aforementioned "Oriential Institude Chicago" for reuse on wikipedia. He was warned by me that any further violation would result in him being brought to the attention of an administrator for severely disrupting wikipedia due to his personal actions. Further attempt to confirm the possibility of the file being authorized for reuse was promptly removed by the uploader on his talker page (User talk:AncientObserver) for unknown reasons. Hence, the file being brought to the attention here. Dave1185 (talk) 20:57, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Dave comes to my talk page every once in awhile to make condescending remarks and warn me about images I uploaded months ago. I have already told him that I will try to do a better job with providing the appropriate copyright info for images and I have not uploaded an image since. I am new to Wikipedia and did not fully understand how the copyright policy worked. I'm not here to be disruptive all I have ever done is tried to be constructive. AncientObserver (talk) 00:38, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.