Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 March 19



File:Rasheeda CERTIFIED HOT CHICK COVER.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Copyrighted album cover, unlikely uploader is copyright holder. &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 01:35, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vessciaesp.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

This site linked in the "source" section is licensed under CC-BY-NC-2.5. I believe that NC can only be used on Wikipedia with a fair use rationale. Because this image is easily replaceable, it does not qualify under fair use. NuclearWarfare  ( Talk ) 03:20, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I've removed two image from the two articles that were using it. Sasata (talk) 04:35, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bellhaven Special School.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

This is a fair-use image which is a replaceable image which doesn't meet the fair-use guidelines. Bidgee (talk) 05:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete anyway, it's so low-quality that you can hardly tell what it is. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  16:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Agree. The metadata indicates it was taken with a Nokia cameraphone ...the white cursor in the pic and window reflection suggests it's a pic taken of a computer monitor (??). –Whitehorse1 20:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Matt Smith.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

This appears to be a smaller image - a heavily compressed jpg - blown up; it doesn't appear to be of the quality one would expect of an informal snap, nor, thanks to the compression, of a studio portrait. Something's wrong about this, and some of the uploader's other images. 91.85.167.80 (talk) 13:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Note to closing admin - process was not completed in that a caption was not added to the article page, or to the talk page of the uploader. I have just completed the process. Edgepedia (talk) 09:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment might this just be an informal snap taken with a camera on a 'phone? Edgepedia (talk) 09:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I've had a look at the uploader's other images, and I can't see any problem, except filling out the licencing details. An image of Simon Pegg was previously listed for deletion Simon Pegg Run, but this was resolved with the comment "I don't see a problem. The user has uploaded a number of photos taken at film premieres and judging from the metadata they're all from the same camera". This account has uploaded a number of image of people, and this seems to be in the same pattern. However, I have no evidence either way. Edgepedia (talk) 18:07, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Defenitely a blown-up, cropped JPG image. Very doubtfull that it is own work as claimed. — Edokter  •  Talk  • 15:23, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Hello people, The photo in question is my own work. I will upload a better quality image at some point.  It had to be cropped close to omit a person to the right. --DavidDjJohnson (talk) 09:12, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Judging from the crop and the quality, I'd say it's indeed a picture taken by a low-res digital camera or mobile phone, probably with a friend of the photographer alongside Smith. That would support the assumption of a fan-photo cropped to remove the third person irrelevant to Wikipedia. I see no reason to assume that this is a professionally made image artificially distorted to look like a fan-made photo. Regards  So Why  20:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Did anyone look at the original uploaded image, frame and all? ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  09:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This is simular to the photo of Scarlett Johnson, uploaded on the same day. Edgepedia (talk) 09:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Those borders look like those a cheap graphics program would create, not like borders that a professional would add.  So Why  20:55, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per SoWhy. --Joshua Issac (talk) 19:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:IrishPassportData.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

This is Irish government copyright and is not the uploader's to release into the public domain. Stifle (talk) 15:35, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I think this was a 'generic' passport page produced by Irish Passport Office as an example of the 'new' biometric passport. I think the face is a composite and the 17th March dob (St. Pat's Day) looks more than coincidental. Pretty sure its not the work of the uploader, nor a reproduction of an actual passport page.. RashersTierney (talk) 20:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Note this comment has been moved Edgepedia (talk) 10:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It's still copyrighted though. Stifle (talk) 21:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pasquale Isidoro Simonelli.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Owning a copy of a photo doesn't mean copyright. No source, no license. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  16:22, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Freedom Woofer.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Thumbnail, no meta-data. May have been taken from elsewhere without permission. J Milburn (talk) 19:59, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Freedom Tweeter 1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Symbol in bottom right indicates this image has been taken from another website, almost certainly without permission. J Milburn (talk) 20:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:KnowledgeBeatClassroom.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Border, low res. Possibly taken from another website without permission. J Milburn (talk) 20:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mission Freedom V Bass Driver.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Thumbnail shot, no meta-data. Probably taken from another website, possibly without permission. J Milburn (talk) 20:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Jerry Kalapus and Tom McCall.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted- F ASTILY  (TALK) 23:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Liscense holder Hashimi defends the image: This image is fits the liscense outlined in CC 3.0. I challenge any user to prove otherwise, and ask: How can I prove it is in this electronic medium?


 * This seems to relate to the discussion at Possibly_unfree_files/2009_March_9 Edgepedia (talk) 14:57, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.