Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 March 2



File:BUSHCHINA.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: License & source updated  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 19:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Cited source is whitehouse.gov, but no description or origin URL is present, and I was unable to find the image through the search of http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/, where Bush administration photos and documents are now archived. Mosmof (talk) 00:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Found it here. We appear to have a higher resolution version, but there's no question that it's the same image. Ray (talk) 06:20, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * In that case it would appear to be PD-USGov. Stifle (talk) 18:41, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mesa Arizona September 2008 Matthew Riche.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Blatant copyvio of, even though that is watermarked, it is of a higher resolution. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  00:57, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HELLFIRE.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

I have closed this PUI and retagged the images as undefined. Also, see Media_copyright_questions. -Andrew c [talk] 15:40, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

No source. Several hits on Google for this image. Obviously a promotional photo not made by the uploader. Erzsébet Báthory(talk 17:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Datelineshow.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Blatantly just a photograph of a still from an unfree TV show. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  17:33, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Creator uploaded the image with a non-free rationale, and only added the GFDL-self tag after a bot tagged the image as having no licensing information. And the bot only did that because of bad formatting on creator's fair use rationale--it was showing up as plain text. I don't know if the image is worth saving, but I've taken the liberty of removing the apparently misplaced tag. (I hope I'm not violating the license or something by doing so) Wkdewey (talk) 03:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jock.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: deleted  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 19:54, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Image licensing tag claims "copyright has expired" but surely this image cannot be more than 100 years old. (ESkog)(Talk) 19:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This has been deleted as no source and replaced by a protected generic image. Stifle (talk) 18:45, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:090209.RafaShoes.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Obviously a screen grab of a TV broadcast, so the free license would not apply. Mosmof (talk) 23:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.