Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 March 20



File:Chikito.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Blatant copyvio of, if that is unavailable, is a derivative. &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 02:52, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Black iPod Shuffle.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Tagged as freely licensed but with a non-free rationale, may depict an object which is subject to copyright and/or replaceable Stifle (talk) 11:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dominatrix in Public.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Uploader has a history of uploading copyrighted non-free art and claiming free use (trying various license statements to see which will allow this). It is simply not believable they took this. The legalistically blurred participants (other than the subject) suggest this is taken from yet another dominatrix site, without permission. / edg ☺ ☭ 12:46, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cullybackey.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of this debate was: Keep. -Andrew c [talk] 00:07, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Site given as source doesn't seem to exist, so CC claim cannot be verified. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:33, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Free image. Putting the given author name in quotes &amp; the source domain minus .tld into Google returned correctly-spelt source straightaway; user had just missed off ".uk" on end of the source link. This took me all of ten seconds.
 * The image is verifiably CC-licensed. I corrected the cited license version (common issue), and added further source info., like date.


 * ESkog, you've commented on the uploader's talk page with a final block advisory, warning against their continuing unlawful (uploading) activity. Of course they should proofread, and sure the direct image link'd probably be nice,  but if their other uploads included the same newbie mistake then apologizing and sharing some howto tips may be worth considering. –Whitehorse1 20:01, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MyeMail.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:35, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Blatantly contains copyrighted logo. &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 15:56, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

opposing that was generated by another place and  give the user access to download the content and reupload for there own use proof try it for your self when you genrate it look for To save this icon..

 Staffwaterboy  Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments 16:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * That doesn't make it free. &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 16:40, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rowe AMPLIFY 2008.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Source states "All rights reserved". &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 16:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, I put it here specifically at the request of Jon Abbey at Erstwhile Records (the photo is taken by his wife Yuko). --ND (talk) 02:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rowe Solo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Source states "All rights reserved". &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 16:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I put the photo there at Jon Abbey's request (it's taken by his wife Yuko), who in turn was relaying Keith Rowe's own request, as he doesn't like the photo of him performing with Doerner very much. --ND (talk) 02:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cassie suicide brandon.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Screenshot of an episode of Skins, which is a copyrighted television program. &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 17:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The_Dreamers_(2).JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Freedom of panorama only applies to buildings in the US. Rockfang (talk) 20:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The_Dreamers_(1).JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Freedom of panorama only applies to buildings in the US. Rockfang (talk) 20:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The_Dreamers_(3).JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Freedom of panorama only applies to buildings in the US. Rockfang (talk) 20:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Feeny.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

geograph.org is just a domain squatter, so I can't find the actual source to verify that this image has been so released. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:05, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Free image. Same .org.uk issues apply as in earlier comment about same uploader. –Whitehorse1 16:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Broughshan masonic hall.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Cited source points to a non-existent web page; can't verify PD claim (ESkog)(Talk) 22:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Author/title search on Google gives the source (ballynagarrick.net), which had been mis-spelt. With that said, I saw zero indication there (ballynagarrick.net/places/broughshane.htm) to verify it was PD. If freedom of panorama did apply to the image that'd be one thing; regardless it's not released by the author as public domain, as far as I can see. –Whitehorse1 20:28, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Broughshane1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Cited source points to a non-existent web page; can't verify PD claim (ESkog)(Talk) 22:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Same comment (diff) applies (unable to verify released as PD). –Whitehorse1 20:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ahoghill coi.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

geograph.org is the cited source; it's just a domain squatter, can't verify claim of license (ESkog)(Talk) 22:18, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Free image. Same .org.uk issues apply as in earlier comment about same uploader. –Whitehorse1 16:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.