Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 March 30



File:Rebels first ep.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Image is that of an album cover, and license says the uploader "releases this into the public domain", and the username somewhat suggests that they may be the copyright holder... however this cannot be proven... Nan oha A's Yu ri    Talk, My master 00:24, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:NewNeighborhood.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Source states "© Copyright 2009 The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois" &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 01:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:Greghall.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

No CC at source. &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 01:16, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:Uvutvcaptionedit.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 
 * The result was wrong venue. &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 16:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

The uploader's name is Jgwpbt, and it just so happens that the TV station is WPBT. conflict of interest? I just did a major neutralization job on WPBT, which really slimmed down the article. This isn't quite covered under a FUR. Raymie Humbert (local radar | current conditions) 04:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:Devon Hose Layer.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Source indicates that this file is copied from the fire service website, yet it has been given a GNU licence which is clearly incompatible. Nothing on website indicates that images are free. TimTay (talk) 07:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:DevonMRV.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Source indicates that this file is copied from the fire service website, yet it has been given a GNU licence which is clearly incompatible. Nothing on website indicates that images are free. TimTay (talk) 07:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:Fireboat.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Source indicates that this file is copied from the fire service website, yet it has been given a GNU licence which is clearly incompatible. Nothing on website indicates that images are free. TimTay (talk) 07:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:Devon4x4.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Source indicates that this file is copied from the fire service website, yet it has been given a GNU licence which is clearly incompatible. Nothing on website indicates that images are free. TimTay (talk) 07:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:LineRescue.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Source indicates that this file is copied from the fire service website, yet it has been given a GNU licence which is clearly incompatible. Nothing on website indicates that images are free. TimTay (talk) 07:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:DevonRanger.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Source indicates that this file is copied from the fire service website, yet it has been given a GNU licence which is clearly incompatible. Nothing on website indicates that images are free. TimTay (talk) 07:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:IRU.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Source indicates that this file is copied from the fire service website, yet it has been given a GNU licence which is clearly incompatible. Nothing on website indicates that images are free. TimTay (talk) 07:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:High Volumpe Pump - DSFRS.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Source indicates that this file is copied from the fire service website, yet it has been given a GNU licence which is clearly incompatible. Nothing on website indicates that images are free. TimTay (talk) 07:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:Urban Search and Rescue.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Source indicates that this file is copied from the fire service website, yet it has been given a GNU licence which is clearly incompatible. Nothing on website indicates that images are free. TimTay (talk) 07:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:71 Vega Panel Express.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Many of this user's uploads have been copyvios or otherwise inappropriate. Metadata shows that the images are taken by several different models of camera. Stifle (talk) 08:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This image and the next five (all by the same uploader) appear to be an amateur photos. I think the uploader’s claim is plausible that he is the original photographer. Other uploads of professional quality work have been correctly tagged as non-free. —teb728 t c 18:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * He admitted on my talk that some of the photos were taken from the web or by his family members. I'm still suspicious. Stifle (talk) 08:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Unless I am missing something, he said on your talk page that the Vertapac and DeLorean images were the only web images he used. Both are tagged non-free historic image. And his family owned cars, but he photographed them. —teb728 t c 08:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Go to external links in Chevrolet Vega select millionth Vega blog. In blog there is a link to these photos of this car with my name listed as the owner. these photos were taken by me in 2008 on my Cannon Powershot camara. and two of them are in this article. Stop tagging my free images please. (VegavairbobVegavairbob (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This is my car. same photo on Cars Domain.com listed under my name as my car. I took the photos as stated.
 * I am convinced these are free images. The uploader did also upload magazine photos of Vegas as well, but those were clearly marked as such. These are free photos, as claimed. – Quadell (talk) 03:01, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:72 Vega Kammback.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:09, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

From the information in the "date" field, it would appear that the user merely scanned this photo and does not have the capacity to release it under the indicated licenses. Stifle (talk) 08:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:1974 Vega GT-midnight blue.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, based on previous uploads. Stifle (talk) 08:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC
 * This was my Grandfather's car as stated in file. I took photo in 1976 in front of my fathers house in Bklyn NY as stated in file. The photo was scanned on my Cannon 310 printer for the article. Please stop tagging my free images. (VegavairbobVegavairbob (talk) 09:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC))
 * see discussion above on 71 Vega panel Express.jpg
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:1976 Vega-1977 NY Auto Show.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

The uploader created only the scan, the copyright in the photograph is unknown. Stifle (talk) 08:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * This photo was taken by me at NY Auto show in 1976 (or 1977) as stated in file. It was scanned for the article on my Cannon 310 printer as stated in file. Please stop tagging my free images. (VegavairbobVegavairbob (talk) 09:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC))
 * see discussion above under 71 Vega Panel Express.jpg
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:76 Cosworth Vega 2673.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Based on the uploader's history, it would seem unlikely that he is the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 08:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

This vehicle was featured in super chevy magazine in january 1988 in an article written by me with black and white photos of slides taken by me and article has my name..Written by Robert Spinello. I have many photos of this vehicle. taken in the 80's. I choose this photo I took in 1988 of the car at a local car show I entered on Long Island, NY for the article sub-section. Please top tagging my free images.(VegavairbobVegavairbob (talk) 09:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC))
 * This photo was taken by me in 1988 of my previously owned vehicle (1982-1992) as stated in file . photo was scanned on my Cannon 310 printer for the article.
 * see discussion above under 71 Vega Panel Express.jpg
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:1975 Cosworth Vega.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Based on the uploader's history, it seems extremely unlikely that he is the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 08:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Please stop tagging my free-images. (VegavairbobVegavairbob (talk) 09:12, 10 April 2009 (UTC))
 * This is a photo of a vehicle- I took photo in 2008.
 * see discussion above un 71 Vega Panel Express.jpg
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:ArabianPrince2007.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

http://blogs.villagevoice.com/music/archives/genre/return_of_the_r/ will be read Copyright © 2008 Village Voice LLC • 36 Cooper Square • New York NY 10003 The Village Voice and Voice are registered trademarks of Village Voice Media Holdings, LLC. All rights reserved. View our privacy policy. Musamies (talk) 14:48, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:Agaricus lilaceps veil.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

MykoWeb does not seem to release its images under the GFDL. J Milburn (talk) 16:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yup. &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 16:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:Fighting words19600522 robins.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Now tagged with an appropriate non-free tag. Stifle (talk) 19:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Screenshot of copyrighted program. &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 16:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

I represent the copyright holder of this image and have already filled out the Non-free media rationale form. Is there something else required of me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Schmidtmandaddy (talk • contribs) 16:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You tagged it as GFDL - which is it? &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 16:21, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Last week I posted another image, and someone contacted me and said I needed to give GFDL permission. So I did that. Then someone else told me to fill out the non-free media rationale form. The correct approach seems to be filling out the NFMR form and using the "screenshot" licensing form from the drop-down menu. Is this correct? If so, I'll change the licensing with this image. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Schmidtmandaddy (talk • contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 18:09, 30 March 2009 (UTC).
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:Agaricus lilaceps.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

No indication on source website that images are released under the GFDL. J Milburn (talk) 17:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I, the uploader, misread the copyright status; now that there's an alternate image available, I'd happily consent to a speedy deletion. Cheers.  I 'mperator 17:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:Phil wave.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Source states "Copyright - 96.4 The Wave" &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 17:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, user is a serial uploader of non-free images and throws around words like "licensed", "fair use", and "legal", in the hope that they will make the tags go away. Stifle (talk) 18:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * In fact, I am going to speedy this as a blatant copyvio. Stifle (talk) 08:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

File:Erie Circle.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Kept license & FuR corrected  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 01:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC) per this is incorrectly licensed. It is not a free image. - this is not a part of the U.S. government. It is an organization not affiliated with any government —  master son T - C 18:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Per Uploader corrected license.  —  master son T - C 03:01, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the tip - there is no dispute - sorry for the inconvenience. —  master son T - C 13:32, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.