Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 March 4



File:TGS Founders.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Derivative work of four webscraped images - the image is not demonstrably free Peripitus (Talk) 03:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:GuruLarrysRetroCornerLogo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

It's a logo of a tv show. multichill (talk) 11:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I am the creator of the TV show, and also the uploader.--Guru Larry (talk) 15:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Retagged as lacking permission on file. Will be deleted if permission is not received. -Andrew c [talk] 14:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Winklerchurchill.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Photo of a painting is derivative work (and not PD-old yet) multichill (talk) 12:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ColorIR SLC temple.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Uploaded using Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, but the image has a copyright watermark. –  j ak s mata  14:40, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Same issue applies to File:Color response of camera.jpg, File:Common FS filters.jpg, File:Filter examples FullSpectrum IR.jpg, File:Starr Kempf full spectrum.jpg, File:Web confucious retreat.jpg. –  j ak s mata  15:40, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * More info: the user's website, says "All photos copyright 2008 by David Twede, Permission required for any use.", which contradicts the Creative Commons license. The uploader is violating his own copyright! I think the images need to be altered to remove the copyright notice, and the website needs to be altered to remove the same, otherwise all the images uploaded by this user (even those without the copyright watermark) need to be deleted. Even though CC licenses are non-revocable, the 2008 copyright for these images predates the CC license given when uploaded to Wikipedia, making the CC license invalid - unless the user removes the copyright notices.
 * Other images with possible copyright violations but without watermarks: File:SFC palace arts pano color.jpg, File:Full Spectrum Garden of Gods.jpg, File:View palace.jpg, File:Side palace.jpg, File:Gog nside fullspect web.jpg, File:Wiki IRC byodoin pano.jpg.

–  j ak s mata  16:39, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Archaeology750BC.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Image is based on a map from http://www.euratlas.com/ (as can be seen from the watermark). No proof that euratlas.com maps are free and http://www.euratlas.com/shop/TermsAndAgreement.html seems to suggest it is not Lokal_Profil 00:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The image uses a blank template from Euratlas, however not those purchasable (as identified by the above link), but free ones which may be used so long they mention Euratlas . Otherwise the map is based on the sources as stated Hxseek (talk) 10:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * They are all "non-commercial only" or "illustration or educational purposes only". Neither of which sounds sufficiently free. /Lokal_Profil 19:36, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Would this preclude its use in Wikipedia, given that its not a commercial sight (is it? ). Would i have to obtain permission directly from the creator, or re-create the map myself with my own template ? And will anyone else add to the interpretation of the matter, apart from yourself, Mr Lokal Hxseek (talk) 06:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes it would. Even though we are a non-commercial site, we are not allowed to accept non-commercial only media except under fair use. ViperSnake151 00:04, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Same thing goes for "educational use only" material. /Lokal_Profil 03:03, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.