Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 May 28



File:7 En Vogue 2008 - Troy Jensen M&P.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Claims to be both a promotional image and pd-author. No proof that uploader is copyright holder. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:12, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Seems to come from here, given the uploaders history where a previous (now deleted) en vogue image they claim to have got the permission from Troy Jensen to use, it seems pretty apparent they aren't the same person. --82.7.40.7 (talk) 19:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of proof that the uploader holds the copyright to the image. —  Σ xplicit  00:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Image_Reinhart100.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: File does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

reason KickNYC (talk) 07:06, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

kickNYC says: This is the not the same photo that is shown on Robert Glider's website. the photo on the glider website has a broader smile. robert glider is gregory reinhart's manager. the photo submitted to wikipedia is gregory reinhart's headshot that is used to accompany articles about him.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Image_Reinhart300.jpg‎

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: File does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

reason KickNYC (talk) 07:14, 28 May 2009 (UTC) Reinhart300.jpg‎

kickNYC says:KickNYC (talk) 07:14, 28 May 2009 (UTC) Gregory reinhart purchased the rights to this photo from the photographer, Claire Besse. She is given photo credit. i guess i am confused as to what is needed in order to post this on gregory Reinhart's page. can you tell me what you need, where to send it and what should be the rights designation from Creativecommons pulldown menu? thank you.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cgg badge.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The image was downloaded from a (now defunct) website, as stated by the uploader. The user that uploaded it had a very short list of contributions and only uploaded two files, both sourced from this website. Doubtful the uploader was the copyright holder or that the website released the image into the public domain. In any case, other replacement images exist. Gump Stump (talk) 07:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CGG Tour.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The image was downloaded from a (now defunct) website, as stated by the uploader. The user that uploaded it had a very short list of contributions and only uploaded two files, both sourced from this website. Doubtful the uploader was the copyright holder or that the website released the image into the public domain. In any case, other replacement images exist. Gump Stump (talk) 07:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Image_Reinhart200.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: File does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

reason KickNYC (talk) 07:25, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

kickNYC says:KickNYC (talk) 07:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC) KickNYC (talk) 07:25, 28 May 2009 (UTC) this photo was sent to me by Gregory Reinhart. i believe it was just a snapshot taken after a performance. i don't think it was taken by a professional photographer. i have the same questions about all 3 disputed photos entries: what must i do in order to have these be allowed on gregory's wiki page? do i email you the permission? under what license do i upload it at creativecommons? i am not very experienced in HTML and find it rather daunting to make the changes that Gregory Reinhart wanted for his page including the photos (allowed and bigger). thanks!
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:GODSWORD-cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

This extremely hi-res image can't be necessary for the article, and thus breaches the NFC criteria. The rationale ("this cover is being uploaded to show users and readers what the cover of this translation looks like") doesn't give any information as to the encyclopedic value of people having large images of Bible translations thrust at them. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► hemicycle ─╢ 13:55, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree w/ this. The image I uploaded was smaller than what's here. However it wasn't me who uploaded the larger image though. It was User:Bakerpub, which I suspect is the same as these people; see . If necessary, I can re-upload the smaller image under a new name. - Thanks, Hoshie 19:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

I replaced the high resolution image of the cover with a low resolution image with the permission of the publisher, Baker Publishing Group. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bakerpub (talk • contribs) 19:43, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SoulDewSprite.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Soul Dew article–where image was used–has been deleted. Ost (talk) 16:45, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:NSCSponsors.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted, but tagged npd

This file is byte-identical to http://www.concretedegree.com/images/sponsors.jpg found on http://www.concretedegree.com/sponsors/index.html I could find no copyright notice anywhere on the site, but I assume that we have to assume it's copyrighted. Ken g6 (talk) 17:34, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * OTRS received at 3071001, awaiting further details. Stifle (talk) 15:36, 10 June 2009 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mark-Beaumont.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader claims it to be public domain. User's website (linked from his user page) indicates that he is not Mark Beaumont and there is no apparent reason to assume that Mark Beaumont put it in the public domain. An image with a similar name was deleted after being taken here before. Pfainuk talk 19:25, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mark-beaumont-2.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Same reason as above (down to the similarly named other image, plus if you check Mark Beaumont's site, fourth column, seventh row, you'll see this photo with a copyright notice. I'm WP:AGF-ing as much as I can here - they both appear to be in the cycling community so there's some small chance that there's a good explanation - but I think we need to hear it. Pfainuk talk 19:25, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Uploader here. Mark forwarded his consent for these photos to be released into the public domain to permissions@wikimedia.org, ticket #2008090410025757 Stocksy (talk) 20:56, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * That email only gives permission for use on Wikipedia, which isn't sufficient. Stifle (talk) 15:37, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.