Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 May 29



File:Tom Lehrer.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Screenshot - not original work of uploader. dave pape (talk) 00:37, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-free image, definitely not copyrighted by the uploader. —  Σ xplicit  00:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Qinhuairiver.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Can't find the original source, but framing/watermarking indicates that this is not likely to be uploader's original work as claimed. (ESkog)(Talk) 01:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cpimlposter.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Copyright likely held by the creator of the poster; a photo isn't enough originality (ESkog)(Talk) 01:47, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Question: The organization that authored the poster is an underground organization, that calls for armed struggle against the state in question. Since there is no legal entity that could claim ownership of the work, could it not be tagged with a free license? --Soman (talk) 08:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:WikipediaReinvinted.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted, since the image was updated. – Quadell (talk) 17:53, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Derivative of Wikipedia logo, which is not a free image. (ESkog)(Talk) 04:29, 29 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I have fixed the problem and am requesting removal of the silly "unknown copyright" tags.

Compression09King Extreme Wikipedian 15:28, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:STMC School Badge.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:10, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this logo. J Milburn (talk) 11:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Saurav ganguly 02.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Seems unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 14:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Image_name.ext

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace " " with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after " ". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:17, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

reason El-Pabloski : Chat  21:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

IMAGE IS FREE —Preceding unsigned comment added by The One & Only Fools and Horses (talk • contribs) 21:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Windows 1 0 crash.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Not copyrighted, since it is not a creative work of human authorship. – Quadell (talk) 17:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

I fail to see why a screenshot of a Microsoft program would be PD. J Milburn (talk) 22:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I fail to see how a random string of error characters is anything copyrightable. A joke could be made about Windows crashing so much that it must be written into the software, but I don't think that's a serious argument. A firework manufacturer can't copyright the explosion that his or her firework makes. It is too unpredictable and lacks creative authorship. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:01, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.