Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 May 5



File:32 Winchester Self-Loading.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

–Drilnoth (T • C • L) 19:22, 11 May 2009 (UTC) This says that it was originally published in 1918; I added its current copyright tag because of that, but I don't actually know if the image's author died more than 70 years ago or not. Bringing it here for further discussion/research. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter when the author died if it was published before 1923. Clearly public domain per PD-US. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, per IronGargoyle. – Quadell (talk) 15:04, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah; my bad. I still get some of the copyright stuff confused; I'd forgotten about the 1923 thing. Thanks! –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 19:22, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sam Brodie Bettay (40).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

This image was recently deleted from Wikimedia Commons for being a copyright violation. The copyright is most likely owned by coolfotodudes.com. AnemoneProjectors (what?) 11:48, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Anus tint.jpg
(NSFW) No evidence that the uploader took that image (EXIF data or the like). From the look of the image and others by the uploader, this is a professional picture, and I would tend to doubt that he holds copyright to it. Amalthea 12:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Also see discussion at User talk:Fredvs79. Amalthea  09:02, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Have to say it doesn't look very professional to me. Are any other photos of his taken using a Canon Powershot? -mattbuck (Talk) 21:15, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * This and the one below are the only ones in question, all others were, as discussed on Fred's talk page, found somewhere on the internet and had to be deleted. After discussion with him, Fred freely said where the other three images originated, but says that he took the remaining two himself. I would tend to accept that if it weren't for the history of File:Full Brazilian wax.jpg; this one was first uploaded with the comment "My ex girlfriend, fair use", but he later wrote that it came from some erotic website. Amalthea  15:20, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

File:After Bleaching.jpg
(NSFW) No evidence that the uploader took that image. It has EXIF data, but is of rather low resolution, so it's still not clear whether it might have just been found on the web. From the look of the image and others by the uploader, this is a professional picture, and I would tend to doubt that he holds copyright to it. Amalthea 12:33, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Also see discussion at User talk:Fredvs79. Amalthea  09:02, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Tin Eye finds this image at various adult sites. Copyvio. – Quadell (talk) 19:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Nooo ... this would have been the first time tineye actually found something for me. :\ Thanks, Amalthea  19:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Full Brazilian.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

(NSFW) No evidence that the uploader took that image (EXIF data or the like). From the look of the image and others by the uploader, this is a professional picture, and I would tend to doubt that he holds copyright to it. Amalthea 12:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:KrzysztofSoszynski.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Web resolution, user already uploaded one copyvio with the same PD-tag. -- aktsu (t / c) 14:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Glazunov1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

I very much doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 17:07, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.