Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 May 6



File:Avril Lavigne during TBDTour.jpg
Listed as pd-self but the linked flickr page says "all rights reserved". Peripitus (Talk) 10:41, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete claims GFDL/CC-by-SA-3.0, but source page at flickr clearly states "All rights reserved". Radiant chains (talk) 07:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

File:090211dvd-chuck-jake1.jpg
I doubt this is own work multichill (talk) 14:24, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

File:2006_SAG_logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: not deleted

This is probably fair use multichill (talk) 15:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I've added a templated FUR. FWIW, it was previously speedy deleted (I4) at File:2006 SAF-mascot and logo.jpg. Amalthea  11:34, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Saam.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Image appears to be a postcard. Not likely to be the author's own work, and hence releasable under GFDL. --Ragib (talk) 20:27, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * This image was published at an online forum, at urduweb.org, but neither me nor google translate speaks Urdu, so I can't even say whether it was published there before or afterwards. Amalthea  11:27, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Deleted - The image is taken from a website and there is no proof of the claimed free licence - unambiguous copyright violation in the face of a lack of evidence to the contrary - Peripitus (Talk) 11:55, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.