Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 October 15



File:Iaf il-76 phalcon awacs.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:03, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

The copyright information in the infobox is wrong--it is actually from JetPhotos.net, where the image info page states that copyright is held by Rami Mizrahi. There is no indication the photographer released the photo under the license stated. Gump Stump (talk) 22:39, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I have marked it for speedy deletion as a copyright violation. MilborneOne (talk) 14:59, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ewest30.jpg
No evidence of free license or PD status at source site Simon Speed (talk) 22:58, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I believe it is in the public domain because it was published in the United States in between 1923-1977 without a copyright notice. Thank you. Hollywoodgenes (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:34, 20 October 2009 (UTC).
 * I contacted the owner of the website where I found the image, and he had this to say, "I find all my images in vintage out-of-print magazines, so I use them under fair use. Plus, my site is a fan site and not a money-making endeavor. If there was a copyright question, I would have no problem removing the photos.Most of her photos were promotional shots, so I think all the rights to the photos belonged to her. As far as I know, there wasn't an estate so I don't know who has copyright control of them since her death. Finding photographer credits in vintage magazines are sketchy at best." Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.177.38.48 (talk • contribs) 03:10, October 20, 2009 (UTC)