Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 October 16



File:CanPassportInsideCover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:26, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Image of a copyrighted passport, Canadian government works are not public domain Samuell Lift me up or put me down 01:43, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Divali Diya.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:26, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Image uploaded on wikipedia in June 2009, but has been available on the web since at least October 2008 (see this blog), without any clear indication that it was released under a free license. Abecedare (talk) 04:15, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Apparently (just noticed), this is just a duplicate of File:Diwali Diya.jpg, an image from Flickr. So it's not unfree, but can be deleted as duplicate. Shreevatsa (talk) 22:40, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:District-9 advertising Canterbury Tail 25 June 2009.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

According to commons:Commons:Freedom of panorama this would be covered by freedom of panorama in Canada as the work depicted is "permanently situated in a public place". Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:35, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

It has been pointed out to me that I have misread commons:Commons:Freedom of panorama. FoP does not apply here. Image will be deleted. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:31, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Derivative work of copyrighted poster. Stifle (talk) 10:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as it has false licensing information (it can't be released under CC as it's a photo of a copyrighted work). It can only be used under fair use. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and fix license. Nihonjoe, remember WP:AGF, you say "fake" licensing info and I say it is a mistake or misunderstanding on the part of the uploader, rather than hostility this should be met with helpful guidance. 86.26.9.106 (talk) 08:50, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Question Isn't this covered under freedom of panorama? --Closedmouth (talk) 07:32, 30 October 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sultan Muhammad Imaaduddeen VI.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

scan of old image - no source or date given, therefore not possible to determine the correct license  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 19:20, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Nasreena Ibrahim.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

given pixelation appears to be scan from printed source; no metadata, no source Skier Dude  ( talk ) 19:21, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Fuvahmulah.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

no source, highly unlikely uploader is the (c) holder of satellite image Skier Dude  ( talk ) 19:22, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

"What I mean satellite image is,those kind of images can only be taken from satellites and everybody can be sure of it. So I can say a "satellite image" of Fuvahmulah. You have a big misconception." Nxxxn (talk) 13:23, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no source for this image, and the uploader hasn't shown that s/he is the (c) holder - just because it's a satellite image doesn't put it into public domain. Skier Dude  ( talk ) 01:34, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Volcanatitlan2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:26, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Old upload I can't find on any free resources. Easily replaceable with better high res photographs It's snowing in NJ–again!  ceran  thor 20:04, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Oldoinyolengaiflankview.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:01, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

My misunderstanding of criteria is evident from back in April 2008 - see this. Copyrighted image.  ceran  thor 20:08, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.