Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 October 24



File:Deepika Padukone.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:01, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

appears to be publicity shot, source provided does not state specific (c) Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:08, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Aarti Chhabria.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:01, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

appears to be professional headshot - no source provided Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:09, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Aditi Govitrikar.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:01, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

appears to be professional headshot - no source provided Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:10, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vikram or the chiyaan.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:01, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

appears to be professional/publicity shot - no source provided Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:10, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Seito.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Claimed as own work; possibly copyrighted unfree.  Zoo Fari  06:34, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Scr300.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept with license as updated  Skier Dude  ►  04:16, 7 November 2009 (UTC) Image uploader mentioned that the image was scanned from an old manual Dave1185 talk 06:55, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I chose the wrong license at the time. It is an Army manual, clearly the work of a US Government employee. I'll change it. - LuckyLouie (talk) 16:52, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nitwiki.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:55, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

No freaking way this is Public Domain; unless the "author" can show proof he or she has the right to distribute it, it is unfree (see here and a quick Google Images search) —Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)What I Do / What I Say 07:41, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Chrome 3.0.195.25 Wikipedia.PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept as updated picture & license.  Skier Dude ►  04:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC) This image has the logo of the English Wikipedia, which is under copyright by the Wikimedia Foundation. The image could easily be replaced by another without the logo. Michaelkourlas (talk) 14:55, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I've uploaded a new version without the logo. An admin will have to remove the old version from the file history, but I can't remember how to request this. (Non-free reduced is used when the image has been resized - I'm guessing there is a similar template for instances such as this.)  AJ  Cham  19:31, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Great, but something new just came up. The licensing has changed to BSD. I checked, and BSD only applies to the source and some seperate executable. How is it licenced under BSD?--Michaelkourlas (talk) 21:21, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Nobody has posted, so I'll start a new section somewhere else.--Michaelkourlas (talk) 12:16, 25 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PWHS logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:55, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Looks like it's been ripped from the website or something similar.  Majorly  talk  23:09, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.