Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 April 11



File:Frankedgar.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:14, 11 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Frankedgar.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Looks like a professional publicity shot. Eeekster (talk) 01:33, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:EdnaMaison.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:10, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:EdnaMaison.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * File indicates this was taken before 1923, however there's no source information which is needed for confirmation. Thirdship (talk) 03:56, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete no source info available to verify date. feydey (talk) 11:19, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete: Available on commons. — BQZip01 —  talk 04:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:GlaBrockwell.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 00:07, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * File:GlaBrockwell.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * File indicates this was taken before 1923, however there's no source information which is needed for confirmation. Thirdship (talk) 04:32, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Retag . The actress only lived until 1929 and it is entirely likely it was taken prior to 1923, but even if it wasn't, I see no evidence that the image complied with appropriate copyright requirements and it is now PD anyway. — BQZip01 —  talk 04:43, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment The actress was active until her death and appeared in 38 films between 1923 and 1929, so I see no evidence that the image was taken prior to 1923. The web source  doesn't provide more detail that we can determine this work as copyright no-notice. --Thirdship (talk) 18:57, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * It also doesn't provide evidence that it has any notice whatsoever. — BQZip01 —  talk 02:40, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:TK Japan 1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:TK Japan 1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Doesn't seem likely that WB Records would have a CC license on this. Eeekster (talk) 09:19, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Found the source: http://www.tynishamusic.com/image/tynisha-japan-holla-music-jam-3


 * Delete Copyrighted + replaceable — BQZip01 —  talk 04:43, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pamirid.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:31, 12 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Pamirid.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Still under copyright as Turaniden-Studien by Ilse Schwidetzky was published in 1950 . feydey (talk) 11:16, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The book Turaniden-Studien by Ilse Schwidetzky Published in 1950, BUT images used in that book were made much earlier! Those images were made in Central Asia in the Soviet Union period in 1920s, i.e. more than 80 years ago,they have NO named author,thus they are free(and also according to the Russian laws images made in the former USSR more than 50 years ago are in the public domain) and this images were used not only in "Turaniden-Studien" but also in many other Russian or Western books on anthropology.-For example Russian book "Ярхо А.И. Краткий обзор изучения турецких народностей Средней Азии. 1927" (Yarkho. Brief review of Turkish peoples in Central Asia.1927)Hope they won't be deleted (Math920 (talk) 03:42, 11 April 2010 (UTC))
 * Keep Math920 makes good points. — BQZip01 —  talk 04:44, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Predominantly turanid-Pamirid uzbeks.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:31, 12 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Predominantly turanid-Pamirid uzbeks.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * As above: Turaniden-Studien by Ilse Schwidetzky Published in 1950 feydey (talk) 11:23, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The book Turaniden-Studien by Ilse Schwidetzky Published in 1950, BUT images used in that book were made much earlier! Those images were made in Central Asia in the Soviet Union period in 1920s, i.e. more than 80 years ago,they have NO named author,thus they are free(and also according to the Russian laws images made in the former USSR more than 50 years ago are in the public domain) and this images were used not only in "Turaniden-Studien" but also in many other Russian or Western books on anthropology.-For example Russian book "Ярхо А.И. Краткий обзор изучения турецких народностей Средней Азии. 1927" (Yarkho. Brief review of Turkish peoples in Central Asia.1927)Hope they won't be deleted (Math920 (talk) 03:42, 11 April 2010 (UTC))
 * Keep Math920 makes good points. — BQZip01 —  talk 04:45, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Aralid uzbeks.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:31, 12 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Aralid uzbeks.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Again from: Turaniden-Studien by Ilse Schwidetzky Published in 1950. feydey (talk) 11:24, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The book Turaniden-Studien by Ilse Schwidetzky Published in 1950, BUT images used in that book were made much earlier! Those images were made in Central Asia in the Soviet Union period in 1920s, i.e. more than 80 years ago,they have NO named author,thus they are free(and also according to the Russian laws images made in the former USSR more than 50 years ago are in the public domain) and this images were used not only in "Turaniden-Studien" but also in many other Russian or Western books on anthropology.-For example Russian book "Ярхо А.И. Краткий обзор изучения турецких народностей Средней Азии. 1927" (Yarkho. Brief review of Turkish peoples in Central Asia.1927)Hope they won't be deleted (Math920 (talk) 03:42, 11 April 2010 (UTC))
 * Keep Math920 makes good points. — BQZip01 —  talk 04:45, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tritonfrost.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Tritonfrost.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Moved to Commons but deleted there per commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Geyser on Triton.gif; unused, free alternative exists. Ilmari Karonen (talk) 23:15, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Deleted Colorized NASA image can attain a copyright and the author claims it. With a clearly free alternative at I see no need to keep it.  — BQZip01 —  talk 04:48, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.