Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 December 14



File:Go Fly Logo.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep, changing license to PD-text. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Go Fly Logo.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Copyvio. I reproduced this image as an SVG format 1 year ago under the delusion that it was acceptable to do so. Kerdek (Tell me if I screw up) 02:05, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:International Hockey Federation Logo.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. I fail to see what the problem is here. SchuminWeb (Talk) 12:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:International Hockey Federation Logo.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Copyvio. I developed this SVG format image myself based on a jpg found through google one year ago under the delusion that it was acceptable to do so.  I'm cleaning up after myself. Kerdek (Tell me if I screw up) 02:06, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ustreammainlogo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. SchuminWeb (Talk) 12:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Ustreammainlogo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

Orphaned images; possibly due to the unique background might not meet criteria for inclusion. :| TelCo NaSp  Ve :|  05:49, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Public domain This seems ineligible to me. A simple gradient effect added to plain text or to a background with plain text doesn't add sufficient creativity to justify copyright.  PD-textlogo seems just fine for both of these.  RJaguar3 &#124;  u  &#124;  t  05:55, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Parkingticketcontract.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: '''Delete. If someone thinks they can make a valid fair-use claim, advise me on talk page and I will undelete'''. After Midnight 0001 13:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Parkingticketcontract.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * DISCLAIMER: Not a lawyer, though I have read a lot of copyright law.

Although the uploader there is a tag that claims that the image is ineligible for copyright, I do not agree. The clearly-legible terms of the contract central to the picture are certainly a creative work and thus attain copyright status. I know that this has been discussed here before (at ), so I would like to address some of the arguments made for keeping. For one, I agree with Gx872op's claim that the logo is not eligible for copyright, as it is a map of the United States colored in red, white, and blue with some text on it. Next, while Reswobsic is correct in that the name of the company and its phone number do not gain copyright protection, he makes the (unsubstantiated) claim that this contract is the exact same copy of text used on parking tickets and thus is not authored by PC of A. First, even if PC of A isn't the original author, someone else has to be the author, and we have no indication that the copyright on this text was lost or expired, or that the text was freely licensed. I would also like to address the comments made as to the copyrightability of legal text. The specific word choice and construction of a legal document can indeed be protected by copyright. Allowing this document to have copyright would not prevent other people from including in their contracts similar clauses that are similarly worded, for in that instance the expression of the clause merges with the idea intended in including that clause (such as disclaimer of loss or theft). However, this does not apply here as we are not writing a contract or discussing the specific terms of the contract, but just including a contract of the form we happen to discuss. To this extent, I don't think the merger doctrine applies here to keep this in the public domain. RJaguar3 &#124; u  &#124;  t  05:52, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I never claimed it was---User:Drilnoth did. (Look at the edit history of the text attached to the picture.) My photo was licensed under the GFDL.  However, I see the underlying issue---whether the content of the image which I took is protected by copyright.  Frankly, I believe there is a strong fair use argument; I just never got around to researching the correct tag for it.  --Coolcaesar (talk) 07:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I apologize for that: I didn't think to correct my opening sentence after I did research on the first PUF discussion. RJaguar3 &#124;  u  &#124;  t  13:56, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PandInc.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:PandInc.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Although listed as a Panda this looks VERY like the WWF logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Blatant infringement, speedily deleted. Thanks for flagging this up. Fences  &amp;  Windows  21:35, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Karl Heinz Kruger.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:34, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Karl Heinz Kruger.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * User has uploaded a bunch of copyright violations related to a hoax article in his/her userspace. I can't find an original source on this one, but I'm fairly certain it's not uploader-created. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:16, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * It was created and used only for hoax article User:Ultima3000/Haven Empire. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:47, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Travistritt95.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:34, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Travistritt95.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Doubt has been expressed that the uploader is the creator of this image. The fact that most of his other uploads have been deleted speaks to this concern, and the image simply does not look like a photo. It looks like a screengrab. This is said to be a shot from 1995 - I don't think it is a coincidence that there is a live video from 1995 called "Travis Tritt - Greatest Hits From the Beginning". Fences  &amp;  Windows  21:26, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.