Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 December 15



File:Solo 24 Pack & Cans.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:50, 31 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Solo 24 Pack & Cans.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The purpose of these photos is essentially to show the can design, a copyrighted work of Schweppes Australia. Mosmof (talk) 04:46, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Very much fair use of the photographs. Contributes greatly to a stub article. Editor182 (talk) 06:53, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * If it's fair use, then you're okay with tagging it as a non-free content or replacing it with a cleaner can graphic? --Mosmof (talk) 13:56, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * That's not necessary, and I've applied a trademark template. It's fine. Editor182 (talk) 08:32, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * But you said it was fair use. Do you not know what "fair use" means? Or the concept of derivative works? --Mosmof (talk) 05:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:George_maxwell.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:50, 31 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:George maxwell.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * 1929 Image sourced to NPG - How can this possibly be GFDL or CC-BY-SA as claimed? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:58, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PhilipMcCluskey1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:14, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:PhilipMcCluskey1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * NC-ND license terms Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:49, 15 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi SFan - Can you please explain your rationale for tagging this file? If you visit the url at www.lovingraw.com/headshots, it states explicitly that it is under CC licensing and is free to use for these purposes. Have I made a mistake somewhere and misinterpreted this? Please let me know, as I am new to Wiki and appreciate the help. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irenadj (talk • contribs) 23:56, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * In the image description, it says "This photo is freely available for non-commercial use under the Creative Commons license BY/NC/ND.", but Wikipedia does not allow images that are licensed non-commercial or non-derivative. --Mosmof (talk) 00:47, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the tip, Mosmof. I'm going to have to go and read up on what Wiki actually DOES allow for images - seems tough to get things on here if a CC license like this won't pass." Thanks for your help. -irenadj —Preceding undated comment added 14:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC).
 * MosMof and SFan - I think that Wikpedia does allow these types of images if they are promotional; can you please confirm? I got the information at under point #4. When you go to this website, it says that these images are available for media/promotional use. So, would that be OK for Wikipedia use? Thanks for letting me know, I'm still trying to work through these guidelines and really appreciate the help.--Irena 14:39, 16 December 2010 (UTC)irenadj — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irenadj (talk • contribs)
 * I have updated the licensing info for this photo, as I believe it's appropriate for use under Wiki's fair-use guidelines. Sfan, do you agree, and is this sufficient to remove the tag you originally placed on the item? Thanks for all of your help! :) irenadj--Irena 14:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC)irenadj — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irenadj (talk • contribs)
 * Wikipedia does not allow "NC" or "ND" licenses because not allowing commercial use or derivative works is too restrictive to be "free". And any stipulation that the image can be used for "promotional" or "editorial" use is also too restrictive. The copyright owner must release all rights to the public domain or license it under CC-BY or CC-BY-SA. You can see the valid licenses here. And the new fair use license does not Under Wikipedia's non-free content criteria because photographs of living people can be replaced with a freely licensed alternative. Mosmof (talk) 16:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Mosmof, for the useful link and info. --Irena 17:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC)irenadj — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irenadj (talk • contribs)
 * Mosmof and Sfan, OK, feel free to remove this one. Copyright holder has released rights for a picture under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. I'll upload another pic and put in the appropriate information for it. Thanks!--98.228.230.170 (talk) 13:16, 17 December 2010 (UTC)irenadj
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The_Legend_of_Snow_White.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:14, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:The Legend of Snow White.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Film artwork - Unlikley to be uploader's own work Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:50, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cinderella_Monogatari.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:14, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Cinderella Monogatari.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Anime artowork/prmotional - Not users own work as claimed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:George_Lundgren_and_Fern_Walters.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:34, 16 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:George Lundgren and Fern Walters.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This looks like artwork from the Arthur TV series - This can't be CC-Zero as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:56, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Updated to reflect actual possible source Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

I edited the image using microsoft Paint so its sort of my own work, besides, I'm new and the Arnold TV series doesn't even exist, and I took the photo MYSELF. Lundgren (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dfdfd.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:14, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Dfdfd.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Organisational logo - so not self? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:57, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.