Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 February 18



File:Jesse-Eisenberg.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Jesse-Eisenberg.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Delete: While the image source I found does not attribute the photographer of the image, I doubt the uploader has the right to copyright the image as claimed. ww2censor (talk) 04:38, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070307 Buffalo Common Council Districts.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Now listed as non-free. Shell  babelfish 13:59, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:20070307 Buffalo Common Council Districts.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Photo of 2D map - Does Buffalo City Hall release as PD? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:37, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:WBACup1931.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete, unfortunately. That was a nice image Jarry1250; I hope you remember to reupload that later on :) Shell  babelfish


 * File:WBACup1931.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Not in the public domain in the United States, since it was still in copyright in the UK on 1 January 1996. - Jarry1250 [Humorous? Discuss.] 12:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm no image expert, but I thought an image only had to be PD in its home country to be used on WP (as opposed to Commons)? Why do we even bother having tags like PD-UK and PD-AR-Photo if the only country in which the image's status matters is the USA.........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:57, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Essentially so we know whether we can transfer them to Commons or not. No, here, we way "just US", on Commons they say "US and country of origin". Now, as a UK resident myself, I don't tag images for deletion with any glee, but the servers are in the US so we're rather powerless override US law. - Jarry1250 [Humorous? Discuss.] 13:17, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Shows how much I (don't) know :-). Not much to add then really, is there?  Shame I just bought a book of football photos from the 1930s specifically because I thought I'd be able to upload them to WP :-P -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I don't know, 1930 photographs will be out of copyright in the US in - what - a mere sixteen years. See you then :) - Jarry1250 [Humorous? Discuss.] 14:09, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Chicago020.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete. The interior of the lobby (public area) is fair game under US Laws, but according to Freedom_of_panorama FoP doesn't apply to visual works of art, such as the lamp. I was unable to ascertain when the lamp was installed (if before 1978 it's considered "published" at that time and falls under normal copyright rules); if we can determine that the lamp is out of copyright, the image could be undeleted. Shell  babelfish 14:51, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Chicago020.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Interior Design and Lamp - FoP applicable to interiors? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:27, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Chicago018.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete. License specifically restricted to non-profit. Shell  babelfish 14:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Chicago018.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source listed does not explicitly say 'commercial' use allowed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:30, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Walnut room.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete. License specifically restricted to non-profit. Shell  babelfish 14:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Walnut room.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source listed says nothing explicit about 'commerical' use Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20080228 Ellicott Square Building (8).JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Wrong Forum. After Midnight 0001 22:47, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:20080228 Ellicott Square Building (8).JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * 3D Artwork - 'utillity' or FoP applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:38, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20080228 Ellicott Square Building (9).JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Wrong Forum. After Midnight 0001 22:46, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:20080228 Ellicott Square Building (9).JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * 3D artwork/work of artistic craftmanship- 'utillity' or FoP applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:42, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20080228 Ellicott Square Building (7).JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Wrong Forum. After Midnight 0001 22:46, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:20080228 Ellicott Square Building (7).JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * 3D Artwork/work or artistic - Although IIRC someone claiming FoP applied to 'architecutral elements' which this would be? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:44, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Polaroid sx70 camera.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:47, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Polaroid sx70 camera.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is an exact match to an image from www.sx70.dk. The uploader claims to have created this image himself, but it's a smaller version of http://www.polaroid-passion.com/forum/images/polaroid/SX-70.jpg and it looks like a product shot. I have serious doubts that the uploader was the person who created the image. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 15:01, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20071117 Art of the Can first place.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight 0001 04:26, 13 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:20071117 Art of the Can first place.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * 3d Artwork - Located in US - So FoP not applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:02, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20071117 Art of Can third place.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight 0001 04:26, 13 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:20071117 Art of Can third place.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * 3D artwork - Located in US - So FoP not applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:10, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20071117 Art of the-Can second place.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight 0001 04:25, 13 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:20071117 Art of the-Can second place.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * 3D artwork - located in the US - so FoP not applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070701 Man Enters The Cosmos.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight 0001 04:25, 13 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:20070701 Man Enters The Cosmos.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * 3D artwork - located in US - FoP applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070919 Pritzker Pavilion bandshell.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Yep, architecture is architecture even when its a boat. Also, tagged fair-use. Shell  babelfish 15:00, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:20070919 Pritzker Pavilion bandshell.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * 3D Architecural work - Fop Applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:24, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - there was already a discussion of this on Commons for a different image of the same bandshell - this is a functional architectural work (the metal panels are also sound reflectors). Please see here and the law on Fop and architectural works in the US here. Ruhrfisch <sub style="color:green;">><> &deg; &deg; 02:24, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070913 iPod 5-6 Gen side-by-side.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free.. After Midnight 0001 15:18, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:20070913 iPod 5-6 Gen side-by-side.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Product design/Screenshots - Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:30, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070906 De La Salle Institute Sign.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight 0001 04:26, 13 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:20070906 De La Salle Institute Sign.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Sign features logo - rest of photo probably OK Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Logo appears to be from 1889 and is PD. — BQZip01 —  talk 05:19, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Also de minimus applies here. — BQZip01 —  talk 01:35, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070808 Flair House.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight 0001 04:25, 13 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:20070808 Flair House.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * PUI refferal due to Logo inclusion - Otherwise OK Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:38, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rahul Sankrityayan books.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:47, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Rahul Sankrityayan books.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Derivative work. No reason to believe that the uploader is the copyright holder Rettetast (talk) 18:25, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete --Hammersoft (talk) 14:21, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070621 North McCormick Court Sculptures.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight 0001 04:26, 13 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:20070621 North McCormick Court Sculptures.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * 3d Artwork located in US - FoP applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:39, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070622 McClintock Court Fountain.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight 0001 04:25, 13 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:20070622 McClintock Court Fountain.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * 3d artwork in fountain Located in US, no date information, FoP applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:42, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: according to the offline source on the article page Art Institute of Chicago Building the fountains were installed by 1931, so if copyright was not renewed it might be public domain because normal US copyright applies per commons:COM:FOP. ww2censor (talk) 23:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:NikkiPatel.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:NikkiPatel.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Dubious sourcing, uncertain that uploader is copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 21:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Calder Flamingo.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Calder Flamingo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * FUR but claimed as CC Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:45, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:How candy apples are made.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:How candy apples are made.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * 1 image in block removed for PUI issues Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:02, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.