Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 February 23



File:Maxine Fife 1946.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:58, 19 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Maxine Fife 1946.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Rather unlikely, that the uploader took this image back in 1946. Quibik (talk) 01:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Retag. I see nothing that or  wouldn't cover.  — BQZip01 —  talk 15:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Adlskfj.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:58, 19 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Adlskfj.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is clearly an artwork - I'm skeptical about the self claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Move to WP:FFD It appears to be artwork of Napolean Bonaparte with someone else's head thrown on it. If it were used on a personal page and the background painting had evidence of being PD, I'd say keep it. Otherwise, it has value in Wikipedia and certainly has no encyclopedic value and should likely be removed via WP:FFD. — BQZip01 —  talk 15:08, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Background painting is PD from commons: File:Jacques-Louis David 017.jpg. As such, I recommend closing this and move it to WP:FFD. This file is almost certainly PD. — BQZip01 —  talk 15:10, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kneber botnet.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:58, 19 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Kneber botnet.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image appears to have been borrowed from this tech blog. Note that the the file was uploaded on Wikipedia a day after the blog was written. The site states that all content is copyrighted by CBS Interactive Inc. Copana2002 (talk) 17:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Without the numbers associated with this graphic, it is of marginal value. That said, I'm not sure this meets the threshold for originality. Pie charts are, by definition, numbers. These facts (A is 15%, B is 35%, etc), by themselves, are not copyrightable any more than the outcome of a pro baseball game. If it is agreed that the chart is problematic, then a pie chart can be created in Excel with the same numbers. — BQZip01 —  talk 01:17, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Felidae.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:14, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Felidae.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No source information about the images used. Orphan. Quibik (talk) 21:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, slightly modified version of the same image: File:Felinoss.jpg. Quibik (talk) 21:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete I would say keep except for the source of the images. I can see a use for this image in feline, but without the sources for the source images, I think it should be removed (same for the other version. If the sources can be verified, keep it. Otherwise, it has to go. — BQZip01 —  talk 16:10, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:10 EPT reverse 2008.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: at. — ξ xplicit  07:49, 6 October 2010 (UTC)


 * File:10 EPT reverse 2008.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Currency - Does Egypt release currency designs as PD? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Additional affected by above : EPT reverse 1984.JPG,File:10 EPT obverse 2008.JPG,File:10 EPT obverse 1984.JPG,File:20 EPT obverse 1984.JPG,File:20 EPT reverse 1984.JPG,File:100 EGP reverse.JPG,File:200 EGP obverse.JPG,File:20 EGP reverse.JPG,File:20 EGP obverse.jpg,File:10 EGP reverse.JPG,File:10 EGP obverse.JPG,File:1 EGP reverse.JPG Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep This has been brought up before with Egyptian notes. I think all of them can easily have a fair use rationale, if needed, but attempts to contact the Egyptian authorities have fallen on deaf ears on multiple occasions. I think this is one of those cases where my interpretation is that the images are . If the government of Egypt complains in any way, they can easily be removed (in the U.S. they would have little recourse as images of the coinage/bills are available everywhere). — BQZip01 —  talk 01:25, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.