Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 January 22



File:LALA.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)


 * File:LALA.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The image appears to be a photograph of a photograph in an exhibition or a book – note the shadows. There is insufficient information to show that the original photograph is in the public domain or was properly licensed by the copyright holder to Wikipedia. In any case, the quality of the image is very poor. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 06:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Derivative work of likely copyrighted image.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SacredHeartOld.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)


 * File:SacredHeartOld.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This image appears to be a photograph of a photograph published in a book – note the edges and the reflection. There is insufficient information to show that the original photograph is in the public domain or was properly licensed by the copyright holder to Wikipedia. In any case, the quality of the image is very poor. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 06:58, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SHCO.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)


 * File:SHCO.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This appears to be another version of File:SacredHeartOld.jpg. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 06:36, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Nabby.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Nabby.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Is this really free? IngerAlHaosului (talk) 06:35, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070802 1243932603 pic4.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)


 * File:20070802 1243932603 pic4.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * image watermarked with cecava.org from http://www.cecava.org/ a copyrighted site. Insufficient documentation to state author is the original owner of the image and able to release under public domain. Calmer   Waters  18:55, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Berevo Lake.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Berevo Lake.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Claimed to be a self-created photograph, but evidently scanned from a printed source. Heavy pixelation; exif data is that of a scanner. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:06, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for nominator's reasons. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 18:21, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Picture of Nick Lachey at KFest 12 June 4,2006.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)


 * File:2859200790066623228KgmLdf fs.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image discription states it is from http://www.k104online.com which specifically states that contents of this site are Copyrighted. Unable to speedy as the images appear to be replaced and updated and I am unable to find the specific URL containing the image (if it still exist) Calmer   Waters  19:39, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: The file was moved from File:2859200790066623228KgmLdf fs.jpg to File:Picture of Nick Lachey at KFest 12 June 4,2006.jpg by at 05:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡  07:14, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LaserXtens.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result was speedy delete as F9, blatant copyright infringement, per . SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:27, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * File:LaserXtens.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 23:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes it's a copy-vio from http://www.ides.com/images/articles/zwick/0805-5.jpg. It was previously deleted before because of a copyvio, that's why I thought I could use G4. Wizard191 (talk) 02:57, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

The file belongs to my organisation; Zwick Roell Group. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zwick_Roell_Group. Please tell me what I have to do to upload these files correctly. I did not understand the procedure in the help pages clearly. The ides.com reference you mentioned above also contains the name Zwick in the URL which should give an indication of the connection to our company Davidtphillips (talk) 14:44, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

If you need more supporting evidence please goto : http://www.zwick.com/en/products/extensometers/non-contact-measurement-systems/laserxtens.html Davidtphillips (talk) 14:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.