Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 January 23



File:Lee jung hyun antoinette2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Lee jung hyun antoinette2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 01:21, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Copyrighted promotional photo of individual who is alive. No evidence of PD release. — BQZip01 —  talk 21:18, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete According to album liner notes, this photo taken by professional photographer Ken Sax. Daram.G (talk) 03:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lee jung hyun wa.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Lee jung hyun wa.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 01:21, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Copyrighted promotional photo of individual who is alive. No evidence of PD release. — BQZip01 —  talk 21:19, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Photo taken by professional photographer Ken Sax. Image fits criteria for speedy deletion (Db-f9). Daram.G (talk) 03:42, 27 January 2010 (UTC) Sorry, this comment was meant for Daram.G (talk) 03:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MrsShoes.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:42, 6 February 2010 (UTC)


 * File:MrsShoes.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Screenshot from a webcast. Tagged as public domain, but the copyright is held by the people who filmed it, not the person who took the screenshot. Prezbo (talk) 05:16, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Prezbo is spot on. — BQZip01 —  talk 21:20, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Yes, Prezbo has it. RandomStringOfCharacters   [T]  04:59, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Originalnikeswoosh-trademarkia-trademark-1972.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; solution provided. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 00:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Originalnikeswoosh-trademarkia-trademark-1972.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This image is not PD-USGov. Svgalbertian (talk) 16:54, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Retag Svga, please take a little time to learn about copyright law and just retag these (in this case and ) instead of starting new discussions on each and notifying users when an upload error is made.  — BQZip01 —  talk 21:21, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Thanks for the "lecture". Are you honestly telling me any trademark published in the US before 1978 cannot hold copyright? --Svgalbertian (talk) 18:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I never said such "any trademark published in the US before 1978 cannot hold copyright" and many certainly could if they meet the criteria, such as a registered copyright and the (C) symbol (realize the protections then and the protections now are not the same). Largely though, most prior to 1978 do not meet this criteria and are in the public domain . — BQZip01 —  talk 02:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I have never seen any trademark published with a copyright mark, so then effectively all trademarks prior to 1978 have no copyright. While that might be what the current legal precedent is, I don't agree with it, and I personally will not be tagging things as PD-Pre1978 myself. --Svgalbertian (talk) 15:40, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * It isn't just trademarks, but ALL images. That doesn't mean they don't have trademark protections. I'm sorry you don't agree with the law and Wikipedia policy. If you insist on tagging things that you know are PD, but you don't like it, I'll have to request some sort of administrator intervention. — BQZip01 —  talk 23:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Administrator intervention? For what? You cannot force for me to do things I disagree with. I am not arguing against the policy or law, but I will not be applying that tag myself. I have not appreciated your tone throughout this discussion. I am sorry if you consider my total of 5 deletion requests disruptive. --Svgalbertian (talk) 02:56, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I said "if you insist on tagging things that you know are PD...". I didn't say you were, but that was the impression you gave. I never said your deletion requests were disruptive. They were obviously made in good faith. If anyone make deletion nominations (though this really isn't a deletion discussion per se) knowing full well that an image is PD, I think you'd agree that that would be disruptive behavior; and that is all I'm trying to prevent. It remains the responsibility of the uploader to make sure an image is appropriately tagged. — BQZip01 —  talk 00:15, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HP-original-logo1954-trademarkia.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; solution provided. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 00:12, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * File:HP-original-logo1954-trademarkia.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This image is not PD-USGov. Svgalbertian (talk) 16:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Retag Svga, please take a little time to learn about copyright law and just retag these (in this case and ) instead of starting new discussions on each and notifying users when an upload error is made.  — BQZip01 —  talk 21:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Image is orphan. --Svgalbertian (talk) 19:55, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Not anymore and it wasn't hard to find a place to put it. Even if it weren't in use, we could just as easily move it to Wikicommons; no need to delete. — BQZip01 —  talk 03:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Maps (1).PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:22, 31 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Maps (1).PNG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * It seems to me that this image was taken from a book or something. The author clearly did not make this image entirely himself. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 20:24, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete It appears to be an older image, so possibly it is PD, but without a source/context, this image is not encyclopedic. — BQZip01 —  talk 21:17, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Beckett910.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:42, 6 February 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Beckett910.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This seems like a photograph of material from a museum exhibition or something. The license status of that material is not clear. Doubts over wether Add925 created this work him/herself. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 21:56, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The image seems pretty straight on, much more like a scan than a picture from a camera. Unless there's something I'm missing? RandomStringOfCharacters   [T]  05:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Beckett7.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:42, 6 February 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Beckett7.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This seems like a photograph of material from a museum exhibition or something. The license status of that material is not clear. Doubts over wether Add925 created this work him/herself. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 21:56, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.