Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 January 4



File:Eichmanntrial.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:32, 6 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Eichmanntrial.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This image was placed on PUI about 19 months ago. Per the discussion at Possibly unfree files/2008 June 7 it appears that this image should have been tagged as non-free until it becomes PD in year 2012.  The discussion in 2008 seems to have been aborted without a final decision being reached. After Midnight 0001 00:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I've replaced it with an image from an ogg file, and I was the only person using it, so it's a moot point. SlimVirgin  TALK  contribs 10:11, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dead-head.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Dead-head.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Studio style shot of a band. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 00:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Doozdoozani.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Doozdoozani.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * File is a cropped version of image from http://www.duzduzani.com/ with no evidence of license. Eeekster (talk) 01:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Acetone.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Acetone.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Studio style photo of a band. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 01:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:AdataOC.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:AdataOC.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 01:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Agugliaro-Stemma.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:10, 29 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Agugliaro-Stemma.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Seal/logo of a city in Italy. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder, judging by the given source.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 01:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Akhtar 3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Akhtar 3.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Studio style photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 03:07, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:AlexRanger1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:AlexRanger1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to be a screenshot of a video game. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 03:24, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pulaski.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Pulaski.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Tagged, but Flickr source page says it's licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 Generic. Noncommercial is not free enough for Wikipedia. —Bkell (talk) 07:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I believe that this was licenses as when I originally uploaded it to Wikipedia.  However, I can't be 100% confident.  I've asked the photographer to change the copyright notice on Flickr for the image.  If not, I'll remove and replace it with my own photo of a Pulaski. -GrantHenninger (talk) 21:25, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:VZcommedorecolours.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:01, 12 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:VZcommedorecolours.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Unfree image, brochure scan, not licensed cc-by-2.0 OSX (talk • contributions) 09:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Holden's brochures are copyrighted and are not licensed under a free-use (CC-BY). Bidgee (talk) 10:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kennedycentre.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Kennedycentre.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source given has no indication to support PD-Self claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:37, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RCP Patch.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Keep; the file is tagged as non-free. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 09:46, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * File:RCP Patch.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Contains logo copyrighted by the Wikimedia Foundation; no fair-use rationale provided. Little Professor (talk) 13:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Brenda asnicar debut.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Brenda asnicar debut.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * CC-BY-SA claim but possible album cover, Inxperienced uploader Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ShannonO'Donnellweather.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:24, 17 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:ShannonO'Donnellweather.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Clearly TV Screenshot- License conflict pointed out to uploader, who it seems then removed the non-free tag... Reffering to PUI in the hop there is something I'm missing? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

-JD2635 22:18, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Please do not delete this image. I'm trying to get this photo downsized but I do not know what software I cvan use in order to downsize the photo in order to keep the photo. I just need help on how to downsize the photo.
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:32, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sandshorrisfilm.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:59, 12 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Sandshorrisfilm.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Orphaned fair use image tagged as public domain &mdash; TAnthonyTalk 15:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HiltonMcRae2.gif
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:HiltonMcRae2.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Looks like a professional headshot, no documentation that photographer/copyright owner has actually released the rights for use here. &mdash; TAnthonyTalk 15:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Simbolo Almo.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Simbolo Almo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Based on a trademarked logo certainly, and perhaps also a copyrighted one if this is not sufficiently simple to be PD-ineligible. In either case "own work" as claimed by uploader (see commons:File:Almotrip.gif) is not correct. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Radyo natin calamba.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Radyo natin calamba.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Clearly a logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:02, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SSATajik woman.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:SSATajik woman.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Web-resolution image, missing metadata, from an uploader who has committed various other copyright infringements in his/her short time here. I can't find an original but would presume that this is also taken from somewhere else. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:XX Per.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)


 * File:XX Per.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * License probably incorrect.  The New  Mikemoral  ♪♫ 22:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.