Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 July 28



File:Boss Coffee logo..jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:42, 28 July 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Boss Coffee logo..jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader claims copyright, but it's clearly a derived work of an image (specifically a logo) for which copyright is assumed by default, per WP:LOGO. As such, it at least needs an fair-use rationale.  Rodhull  andemu  00:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:KevinRudd.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC)


 * File:KevinRudd.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Lack of metadata and low resolution. Probably a TV grab and not own work by Flickr user. Barrylb (talk) 01:15, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Timeshift (talk) 01:49, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Without cross-checking against other photos, this appears to be from Rudd's 2007 victory speech. Nick-D (talk) 11:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Banway.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:58, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Banway.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * A search in Tineye.com reveals the file is on site/page http://www.generaldistribution.com/go-127.htm Does this image's poster claim to be representing the site's venting machine distributor? This image was previously deleted on Wikimedia Commons. Myotus (talk) 06:00, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Milfbridge.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Milfbridge.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * As noted on the image description page more than two years ago, this appears to be a television screenshot. Nyttend (talk) 17:17, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Forsythe and Fullerton2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. - F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 02:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Forsythe and Fullerton2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Screenshot. Caption in the article states "Forsythe and Fullerton in To Rome With Love" - how is this a free image ? Was copyright of the work not renewed ? Peripitus (Talk) 21:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Please see the discussion on User_talk:Watchout4snakes! and User talk:Peripitus...the uploader is asserting that the images were taken by her grandmother and now belong to her to upload. In the absence of further information I have no reason to disbelieve this - Peripitus (Talk) 10:43, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mel Fullert2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:58, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Mel Fullert2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Promo shot - how is this public domain or owned by the uploader ? Peripitus (Talk) 21:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mel Fullerton c1970.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:58, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Mel Fullerton c1970.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Nothing on the image page indicates how the uploader owns the copyright to this image - I think this appears self-digitised rather than self-originally-made Peripitus (Talk) 21:45, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mel Fullert1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:58, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Mel Fullert1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Nothing on the image page indicates how the uploader owns the copyright to this image - I think this appears self-digitised rather than self-originally-made Peripitus (Talk) 21:45, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Forsythe and Fullerton.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:58, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Forsythe and Fullerton.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Nothing on the image page indicates how the uploader owns the copyright to this image - I think this appears self-digitised rather than self-originally-made Peripitus (Talk) 21:45, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:De La Salle Collegiate High School (Warren, Michigan) logo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is now tagged as non-free. - F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 02:02, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * File:De La Salle Collegiate High School (Warren, Michigan) logo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Unsupported claim of copyright-free release; per WP:LOGO, this is presumed to be copyrighted and needs a Fair-use rationale. Rodhull  andemu  23:45, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, PD-ineligible. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:26, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Why? PD-ineligible only applies to pure text/font without creative input; this is a designed arrangement of letters and colours involving creative input; accordingly, as a logo, it is copyrightable. Rodhull  andemu  00:43, 8 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note - had conflicting licenses - I've removed the 'no rights reserved' & kept the logo. Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:36, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Logo Copyright/Trademark/Typeface. We host tons of similar images under pd-textlogo claims. This isn't a case of other crap exists, but precedent. -Andrew c [talk] 04:42, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.