Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 July 5



File:Mai Selim.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:18, 19 July 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Mai Selim.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to be a studio shoot. Eeekster (talk) 03:15, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Youssef aft.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep, license adjusted by uploader. — ξ xplicit  00:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Youssef aft.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I doubt that the uploader had taken this photo. Leyo 09:04, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * taken from 1891 union college yearbook, copyright has expired Eli  +  09:37, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * That was not evident from '81. :-) The author and the license are still incorrect. --Leyo 09:44, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

That was one of my earliest uploads, i was not familiar with the policy. anyways, i fixed the tags. Please note that there is no other alternative media Eli  +  10:00, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It is probably OK now. --Leyo 11:50, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Solectron_close.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:18, 19 July 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Solectron close.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Sent to PUI - As this is an image of a logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:50, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SCE Playstation 3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:53, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


 * File:SCE Playstation 3.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Free images are indeed available and are already on Wikipedia.  Chimpanzee  - User | Talk | Contribs 15:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * OK. What do you mean with source? The source is SCE, because the imagine is made and owned by SCE. And I gave the real source, so why should it be deleted? Yeah, thats right. There are free images already on Wikipedia, but no one of them are better imagine then this one. I know about a free imagine http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Playstation3vector.svg, but that imagine is not better then this one. First at all the other imagine is not very real, it all is made from a imagine software. Second on this imagine is the PS3 more real. Can you give me some other free images if you think some of them are better then this. I just want to let this imagine be on Wikipedia, because it is a very good imagine. Pandapower.1 20:15, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * See Non-free content. Simply claiming that a non-free image is "better" is not sufficient, especially when "better" presumably refers to the image in a decorative sense. I agree that a vector illustration does not serve the article very well in that it is less informative and even misleading about the console's features and appearance, but it is the consensus choice among the article's regular editors, who prefer the artificial clean look over the reflections seen in the free photographs uploaded so far. Dancter (talk) 19:30, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * This is the wrong forum for this discussion. There is no dispute about the copyright status of the image. The dispute is over whether the image satisfies WP:NFCC. Dancter (talk) 19:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:UKUSCANADALEADERS.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:18, 19 July 2010 (UTC)


 * File:UKUSCANADALEADERS.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I'm not convinced the uploader took this photo themselves, as claimed. It looks like a press shot and the uploader has a history of copyright infringements. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:36, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:OrlaaandoWeeeks3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:18, 19 July 2010 (UTC)


 * File:OrlaaandoWeeeks3.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to be a video still, unlikely to be public domain and loaded by an anonymous account. Fæ (talk) 22:00, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The uploader was indefinitely blocked some time ago due to extended sock puppetry. Part of this sock puppetry was to create fake pages using images which were claimed to be taken by the uploader but included no EXIF data and are more likely to have been copied from a non-free source. There is no evidence that this sock puppeteer took these photos or has permission to issue them as public domain. The uploader has never responded to questions on their talk pages about these images even though around 40 images have been questioned. Fæ (talk) 09:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.