Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 June 6



File:Telstra Building Rockhampton.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Telstra Building Rockhampton.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader has a history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming it as their own work, also what makes this files more suspicious is the low resolution and no EXIF data. Bidgee (talk) 07:22, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tilt Train at Rockhampton Station.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Tilt Train at Rockhampton Station.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader has a history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming it as their own work, also what makes this files more suspicious is the low resolution and no EXIF data. Bidgee (talk) 07:23, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Archer Park Steam Tram.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Archer Park Steam Tram.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader has a history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming it as their own work, also what makes this files more suspicious is the low resolution and no EXIF data. Bidgee (talk) 07:23, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dreamtime Cultural Centre.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Dreamtime Cultural Centre.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader has a history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming it as their own work, also what makes this files more suspicious is the low resolution and no EXIF data. Bidgee (talk) 07:24, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rock Pool Water Park.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Rock Pool Water Park.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader has a history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming it as their own work, also what makes this files more suspicious is the low resolution and no EXIF data. Bidgee (talk) 07:25, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Heritage Village.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Heritage Village.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader has a history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming it as their own work, also what makes this files more suspicious is the low resolution and no EXIF data. Bidgee (talk) 07:26, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Stockland Rockhampton Entrance.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Stockland Rockhampton Entrance.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader has a history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming it as their own work, also what makes this files more suspicious is the low resolution and no EXIF data. Bidgee (talk) 07:27, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Northside Plaza.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Northside Plaza.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader has a history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming it as their own work, also what makes this files more suspicious is the low resolution and no EXIF data. Bidgee (talk) 07:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Crane in Rockhampton's Skyline.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Crane in Rockhampton's Skyline.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader has a history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming it as their own work, this is a orphaned file, doesn't state what development it is being used by and low resolution. Bidgee (talk) 08:02, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sunbus Bustech MDi.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:13, 6 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Sunbus Bustech MDi.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader has a history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming it as their own work, this is a orphaned file, doesn't state where it was photographed and low resolution. Bidgee (talk) 08:07, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Just a minor note, but I don't consider 1,600 × 1,200 pixels to be low resolution. —RP88 (talk) 09:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * When a file is 1,600 × 1,200 pixels and a file size of 386 KB, I do call low resolution even if it has a dpi of 180. Bidgee (talk) 14:25, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Doesn't matter, Image found on Picasaweb Bidgee (talk) 14:35, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that looks like clear copyright violation, the upload at Picasaweb occurred several months before it was upload here, and the account at Picasaweb doesn't share any similitaries with the uploader here. —RP88 (talk) 14:53, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The Honeymoon Thrillers.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 11 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:The Honeymoon Thrillers.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The uploader states that the image has been released under the CC-BY 2.0 license, but the source says nothing about this. Theleftorium (talk) 09:12, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The uploader changed the license to "non-free promotional", so I've therefore tagged the image with . Theleftorium (talk) 15:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LoyolaSacredHeartHighSchoolFrontEntrance.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:LoyolaSacredHeartHighSchoolFrontEntrance.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The uploader states that the image is "intended for public perusal" because it comes from the school's official website, http://lshhs.missoulacatholicschools.org/Home. However, this website states "©2009 Loyola Sacred Heart Foundation" so the image can't be used on Wikipedia without evidence that it has been released in the public domain or under a copyleft license. Theleftorium (talk) 13:02, 6 June 2010 (UTC
 * I assumed the copyright refers to the website design, as it's not specifically attached to the image. Nevertheless, I'll attempt to make contact with the school authorities and ask permission, since it appears to be a problem. Apologies for any confusion; I'm pretty new to editing. Narissara (talk) 15:37, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * That's ok. Thanks! Theleftorium (talk) 15:58, 6 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Narissara, you can find instructions on seeking permission to use other people's images in Wikipedia at Requesting copyright permission. —RP88 (talk) 16:02, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Standard_bank.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ xplicit  03:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Standard bank.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Artwork/Architectural design, Is FOP applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:55, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Pakistani copyright law says that neither "making or publishing of a painting, drawing, engraving or photograph or an architectural work of art" nor "making or publishing of a painting, drawing, engraving or photograph of a sculpture or other artistic work if such work is permanently situated in a public place or any premises to which the public has access" are infringements of copyright. —RP88 (talk) 14:03, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per RP88. FOP applicable in Pakistan. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:16, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Georgia Guidestones English Full.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep, file licensed under PD-US-1989. — ξ <sup style="color:#000000;">xplicit  03:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Georgia Guidestones English Full.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Per U.S. FOP laws, this is copyrighted as it was made in 1979.  — fetch ·  comms   22:35, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * When was the text written? The pictured object is a simple piece of stone, not an artwork (if stones could be copyrighted, imagine what would happen to quarries and manufacturers of grave markers!), so the text itself is the only copyrightable aspect, other than the photo itself.  Nyttend (talk) 04:25, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. This should be in the public domain per PD-US-1989. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:16, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.